gnu-arch-users archive search

Results:

References: [ ViewARCH: 155 ]

Total 155 documents matching your query.

1. [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.3 (score: 40): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 22:15:36 +0900 (JST); Hi, ViewARCH-0.0.3 is now available. Nothing has changed on the surface. address@hidden/ViewARCH--tez--0.0.3 (http://arch.bluegate.org/cgi-bin2/viewarch.cgi) (http://arch.bluegate.org/cgi-bin2/viewar; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-10/msg00337.html (6,608 bytes)
2. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH and signed archives (score: 39): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:36:00 +0900 (JST); Hi, I've just migrated from non-signed to signed archive yesterday. address@hidden http://arch.bluegate.org/{archives}/address@hidden It seems to work well. Here the session from another machine over; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-01/msg00289.html (7,491 bytes)
3. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2 (score: 39): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 08:48:58 +0900 (JST); Hi, ViewARCH is a _normal_ CVS tracking branch of ViewCVS. If something occurrs in ViewCVS's core part, I can get it by executing "cvs up" in the top directory. I can do "cvs diff" anytime, too. But; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00326.html (9,044 bytes)
4. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH 0.0.1 (score: 39): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 15:29:52 +0200; I gave it a try, and after fixing two little buglets, it works like a charm! Thanks! The two fixes can be pulled from: address@hidden ftp://bonehunter.rulez.org/archives/misc address@hidden/ViewArch; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-08/msg00211.html (5,589 bytes)
5. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] viewarch displays no archives (score: 38): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:45:14 +0900 (JST); Hi, 1.) Can I get the output of your $ tla -V ? ( I've not checked with tla-1.2, yet ). 2.) With what uid do you invoke your httpd ? Do you have enough permission in /tmp/test and its children ? - Te; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-01/msg00066.html (6,902 bytes)
6. [Gnu-arch-users] viewarch displays no archives (score: 38): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 01:35:47 +0000; Hi, I'm wondering if anybody could shed some light on this problem I'm seeing with viewarch. I've tried both version 0.0.6 and 0.0.5 (thinking that maybe the bleeding edge version was subtly broken).; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-01/msg00064.html (5,680 bytes)
7. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.4 (score: 38): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 09:31:30 +0900 (JST); I checked over the network again. It seems to work well. Here the session: address@hidden ViewARCH]$ tla get -A address@hidden ViewARCH--tez--0.0.4 * from archive cached: address@hidden/ViewARCH--tez; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-10/msg01010.html (6,240 bytes)
8. [Gnu-arch-users] Re: viewarch displays no archives (score: 37): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 01:47:41 +0000; Ok, managed to set it up on the server now, but with no more luck: http://brautaset.org/cgi-bin/viewarch Stig -- brautaset.org; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-01/msg00065.html (5,050 bytes)
9. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.3 set python execuable (score: 37): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:11:12 +0900 (JST); Hi, I can't confirm this situation in my box exactly, but I guess the following steps would work well. 1.) Edit ./viewcvs-install script's first line. Replace To 2.) Take normal installation steps. 3; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-10/msg00587.html (6,060 bytes)
10. [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH--0.0.5 (score: 36): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 14:50:45 +0900 (JST); ViewARCH--0.0.5 is now available. Note: This version supports tla-1.1pre8 or higher. It doen't have any kind of big changes. Especially, internal cache format is unchanged. Now you have to set "tla_a; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-12/msg00091.html (4,388 bytes)
11. [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2 (score: 36): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 08:42:00 +0900 (JST); Hi, I made ViewARCH-0.0.2 and its cache generator. Demo: http://arch.bluegate.org/cgi-bin/viewarch.cgi Directory browsing example: http://arch.bluegate.org/cgi-bin/viewarch.cgi/address@hidden/tla--de; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00243.html (7,103 bytes)
12. [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH 0.0.1 (score: 36): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:43:02 +0900 (JST); (previous one seems black-holed... send it again...) Hi, Here it is: address@hidden http://www.bluegate.org/{archives}/address@hidden address@hidden/ViewARCH--tez--0.0.1 Notes: Because my honey is st; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-08/msg00138.html (5,653 bytes)
13. [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH 0.0.1 (score: 36): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:52:55 +0900 (JST); Hi, Here it is: address@hidden http://www.bluegate.org/{archives}/address@hidden address@hidden/ViewARCH--tez--0.0.1 Notes: Because my honey is still asleep, this archive is just temporal. It will be; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-08/msg00095.html (5,650 bytes)
14. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.4 (score: 35): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:55:13 -0700; Is there a mirror of this somewhere? The archive seems to be unavailable and I was hoping to give it a try today. ViewARCH-0.0.4 now available. [...] Archive location: address@hidden http://arch.blue; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-10/msg00997.html (5,125 bytes)
15. [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.4 (score: 35): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:24:32 +0900 (JST); Hi, ViewARCH-0.0.4 now available. Demo: http://arch.bluegate.org/cgi-bin2/viewarch.cgi Performance measurement: Cache size v.s. linux-2.5.x: http://arch.bluegate.org/cache_graph_1.gif Generating elap; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-10/msg00926.html (6,086 bytes)
16. [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2 (score: 35): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 17:08:52 +0900 (JST); I don't think it's a good idea, Because every inventory can change its name (= file name). I've not tried your work thoroughly yet, but suspect that it can't track the file name transition. A good ne; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00679.html (7,391 bytes)
17. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2 (score: 35): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:35:33 +0900 (JST); Because ViewCVS wouldn't migrate from CVS -> arch, ViewARCH would stay in its tracker forever. All I wanted to say is I can take in both work (that is, ViewCVS's own work, and ViewARCH's own work) at; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00437.html (8,456 bytes)
18. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2 (score: 35): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 05:54:53 -0700 (PDT); Perhaps, or perhaps not. There's three issues: long-lived processes, three-stream processes, and interface stability. There's quite a leap in the tedious details of interface and implementation comp; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00382.html (10,566 bytes)
19. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2 (score: 35): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:43:32 +0200; HI! As I understand, ViewARCH interfaces with tla, right? Wouldn't it be cool if all of archs functionality was bundled in functions of a library which tla and ViewARCH (and others) would link agains; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00358.html (7,608 bytes)
20. [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2 (score: 35): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 08:14:00 -0500; Tez, It looks cool, but a couple of questions: 1. What exactly is the relationship between ViewARCH and ViewCVS? It seems to install *both* scripts and config files for each. 2. How large will that c; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00294.html (7,437 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]