gnu-arch-users archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ ViewARCH: 155 ]

Total 155 documents matching your query.

101. [Gnu-arch-users] Problem with tla on NetBSD 2.0. (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:04:28 -0800
I'm having a problem with tla (from pkgsrc) on NetBSD 2.0. I had the same problem with one I'd built myself from sources, but I don't quite get what's going on. Here's an example of me running replay
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2005-01/msg00010.html (7,007 bytes)

102. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: release goals for Bazaar 1.1 (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:37:39 -0500
Couple of suggestions about features related to "blame" discussed in this thread. There is one nice feature in viewarch, which I find using more often than "blame". In ViewArch, it is called "chrono"
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-12/msg00126.html (11,542 bytes)

103. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] file annotate (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:05:29 +0900 (JST)
Indeed. I think we should have it in tla itself. My long term plan is: 1. factor out "cache generator + valis" from ViewARCH. 2. add a "deep survey mode" to the cache generator which traverses each a
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-03/msg01127.html (6,635 bytes)

104. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New feature at the mirror + request for help (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:01:28 -0500
[deleted quote that I was looking for something in php] How big is the cache? Is it as bad as having a revision library? back when there were about 60 archives, I tried generating a revision library
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-03/msg00940.html (9,340 bytes)

105. [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwin] (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:05:38 -0800
Secondarily, is it possible to provide a way out of this morass once it exists? I don't know from Dustin's description if his archive has actually been corrupted or not. If it has I realize there ma
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-03/msg00297.html (8,173 bytes)

106. [Gnu-arch-users] Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwin] (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:48:28 -0600
My preferred OS is GNU/Linux, however at work I write Windows code for construction companies associated with my employer. One of our competitors nearly did themselves in trying to force a *nix solu
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-03/msg00526.html (11,178 bytes)

107. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:12:08 -0800 (PST)
Suppose that someone wrote a C library you'd really like to use but it has header files: x.h X.h would you say that the C language should be changed? Will a tar file containing "./x.h" and "./X.h" w
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-03/msg00490.html (8,854 bytes)

108. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 21:46:56 -0800
I don't understand what the subdir structure has to do with case sensitivity. Can you explain? http://bsdboy.west.spy.net/cgi-bin/viewarch.cgi/address@hidden -2004s/ViewARCH--devo--0.0.8--patch-21/%
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-03/msg00177.html (11,102 bytes)

109. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OP2() elimination (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:35:41 +0900 (JST)
No problem. Any other works aren't related to ViewCVS. Thanks. :) [ ViewARCH's recent version does not depend on ViewCVS so much. Essentially, the only depedent parts are 1.) html template generator
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-02/msg00295.html (5,405 bytes)

110. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: release goals for Bazaar 1.1 (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:02:27 +0000
This is available for several weeks in the axp/archzoom upstream lines. New releases will be in December. Regards, Mikhael.
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-12/msg00138.html (7,461 bytes)

111. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: release goals for Bazaar 1.1 (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:20:23 +0000
Do you have to turn it on explicitly, or is it only available in releases more recent than 0.3.2? I can't seem to find it... Stig
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-12/msg00136.html (7,327 bytes)

112. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: release goals for Bazaar 1.1 (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:03:00 +0000
Yes, handy. This is called "history" in archzoom, axp & archway. Regards, Mikhael.
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-12/msg00129.html (7,328 bytes)

113. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: release goals for Bazaar 1.1 (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:41:15 +0000
+1 That is the one killer feature of ViewARCH for me. Stig
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-12/msg00128.html (7,234 bytes)

114. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New feature at the mirror + request for help (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:07:51 +0100
A python module exists. It should be quite easy to add that. And, really, it's probably faster in python even with the exec. That is, I was able to find comparsion showing that perl is a hell lot fas
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-03/msg00946.html (10,154 bytes)

115. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New feature at the mirror + request for help (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 23:36:51 -0800
I also believe that ViewARCH is written in python. That means I'd have to run it as a cgi, which in turn would require an exec. As such, I'm holding out for something written in php because I have a
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-03/msg00945.html (8,797 bytes)

116. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New feature at the mirror + request for help (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 23:04:00 -0800
No, I still don't have an arch browser yet. All of them seem to have an achilles heel -- they either require a revision library or require building a cache. While I haven't tried anything that requi
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-03/msg00942.html (9,427 bytes)

117. [Gnu-arch-users] my repo is up again. (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:00:51 +0900 (JST)
I put additional license file in ViewARCH's tree to use some ViewCVS's module safely. Greg Stein accepted it. Now my master repo is up again. Even if more tweaking about license issue would be needed
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-02/msg00304.html (4,086 bytes)

118. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OP2() elimination (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:28:51 -0500
Tez, I renabled your archives after removing the viewarch categories. If you have more viewarch stuff squirrelled away that I didn't see, just drop me a line and I'll make them go away with an rm -rf
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-02/msg00292.html (5,568 bytes)

119. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Outpupt of 'tla srcfind' (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Yup, I wondered if that one would bite you. The new column can contain a '?' if the first column is not 'S' and the file was classified as it was because of an `untagged-source' rule. In other words
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00939.html (4,975 bytes)

120. [Gnu-arch-users] Outpupt of 'tla srcfind' (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:44:07 +0900 (JST)
Hi, I have a question. I'd like to confirm 'tla srcfind' output. old version of tla: address@hidden ViewARCH--0.0.3]$ /usr/local/bin/tla srcfind | head -1 S ./CHANGES but new one is: address@hidden V
/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00914.html (4,562 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu