Folks, I have a question. Suppose there is a directory named d, which has two regular files named X and Y, just like: $ find . -print . ./d ./d/X ./d/Y $ The contents of X is x, and Y's is y. So I ca
Accesso alla posta elettronica via Web (outlook Webmail) Hi, this patch allows one to run get-changeset while outside a project tree, without specifying a fully qualified revision number. This means
It's more like `cvs annotate' than like what I'm looking for, although it is a bit better than `cvs annotate' since it does show some previous contents. But its horizon is limited to the current bra
ViewARCH does a nice job of this, for example: http://arch.bluegate.org/cgi-bin/viewarch.cgi/address@hidden/tla--devo--1.3--patch-28/libarch/inode-sig.c?cmd=cc Although it's a complete revision brows
And if you check the 1.3 version instead, you get to see how archive cycling is annoying once more. The `blame' should look further than the artificial horizon imposed by the beginning of the curren
I know that there is no equivalent of "cvs annotate". How would I figure out in which patch was a specific line of a source file modified? I use ViewARCH for any file-level stuff I want to look at:
[...] When it comes to the matter of ViewARCH, cache generation is optional. Even if you don't execute gencache.py, rest of the stuffs are still available. - Tez
This comes from 'http://www.kerneltraffic.org/wine/latest.html' 2. Investigating Arch for Revision Control 17 Mar (5 posts) Archive Link: "Branching/version control [was Re: cards.dll]" Topics: Proje
These all look like pretty minor things, really. I've certainly seen longer lists of objectionable things about cvs and svn, and I expect bk has plenty of its own. I find cvs revision numbers and svn
files=20 to i18n, strings stuff. http://arch.bluegate.org/cgi-bin/viewarch.cgi/address@hidden/tla--OP2-eliminate--0.1 Oh, man. I just got around to wanting to merge the OP2 changes but because of th
Did they elaborate? It is a very short license, and about the only thing you are required to do is provide the license agreement with source and binary distributions. Did you leave the license file i
Do you want to keep the same structure in the moved pages? I assumed so and started moving "Why Use Arch". The most confusing/annoying thing for me on the old wiki is all of the links to links. For
I'd really like to see it if only because I think it's really the last major remaining architectural flaw in arch. All the other bugs are mainly user interface and performance related. I'm still int
I think that was something Major was maintaining on quackerhead. We're both a touch time-impacted atm (work, other side projects), so I'm unsuprised it fell by the wayside when quackerhead went down
I've lost the link, but there was one running viewarch for a while, with mirrors of all the known public mirrors. I'm not sure what happened to that. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertco
As a matter of comparison, there is no such equivalent for Clearcase. Probably because Clearcase handles branching much better than CVS ever will. Having read the rest of the thread, I guess that yo
... what about tla get foo<tab><tab> ? That exists today. I don't think this is appropriate. One of arch's strengths is it's great flexability. If I chose to use mainline for only production integrat