gnu-arch-users archive search

Results:

References: [ ViewARCH: 155 ]

Total 155 documents matching your query.

141. [Gnu-arch-users] distinguished branch name, "clone" (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 17:36:29 -0500; * distinguished branch First of all, as you all know, in CVS there is a distinguished branch name, "HEAD", which is the default branch. It is usually used to hold most forward development. I'd like t; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-11/msg00084.html (9,010 bytes)
142. [Gnu-arch-users] Broken neon on ia64 address@hidden: tla segfault] (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 12:57:01 +0100; Looks like updating neon, or rigging tla to use an external libneon, is becoming more important. -- Forwarded message from Wichert Akkerman <address@hidden> -- Hi Andrew, can you please look into thi; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-10/msg01022.html (8,811 bytes)
143. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] TLA on Cygwin (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:02:46 -0700 (PDT); What are you going to do about all those revisions that already use the existing paths? For example, simply untarring certain base-0 revisions will want to create paths of the current sort. If you c; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg01108.html (6,810 bytes)
144. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Ruminations on Arch Desiderata (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:22:39 -0700; Hi Doran! How useful, really, is automatic registration of archive names beyond about two dozen anyway? I have 20-odd archives registered and already that's too much to reliably remember without some; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg01072.html (10,242 bytes)
145. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Ruminations on Arch Desiderata (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:21:41 +1000; [snip] How useful, really, is automatic registration of archive names beyond about two dozen anyway? I have 20-odd archives registered and already that's too much to reliably remember without some ki; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg01031.html (9,290 bytes)
146. [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:39:23 -0700 (PDT); The original agenda for 1.1, aside from simple bug fixes, was: *) the inode signature optimization *) =tagging-method generalization *) fancier support for "partial commits" The agenda changed in a; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00820.html (9,096 bytes)
147. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch history? (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 15:08:45 -0700 (PDT); The parts I can safely answer from memory: Privately (i.e, before announcements or distribution): November 2001. (An earlier system was scrapped -- approximately early 2000, if I recall correctly.); /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00734.html (6,746 bytes)
148. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Utterly painless arch? (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:01:19 +0900 (JST); I have no way but admit your opinion. If tla's name space will be cleaned up better, I'm delighted to modify ViewARCH to fit it. - Tez; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00438.html (7,395 bytes)
149. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] archive/category meta-info (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 06:54:05 -0700 (PDT); You can safely stick files named '=README' in an archive and they will (because of the namespace syntax) not be confused for categories, branches, or versions by tla. They also won't be (and shouldn; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00395.html (6,890 bytes)
150. [Gnu-arch-users] archive/category meta-info (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:34:28 +1000; With things like ViewARCH, Alexander's archive list and `tla grab` happening all over the place, I'm feeling the need for some human-readable meta-info attached to archives. The address@hidden syntax; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00381.html (5,201 bytes)
151. [Gnu-arch-users] Call for an Icon (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 21:00:47 -0500; As some of you may know, and others may not care. I'm working on a GUI shell for arch. I wanted to start the search for an icon now. I think that the ViewARCH project could probably make use of the s; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00337.html (5,796 bytes)
152. [Gnu-arch-users] Ooops (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 08:48:22 +0900 (JST); Ah... The location of "address@hidden" also moved. New location: address@hidden http://arch.bluegate.org:8080/{archives}/address@hidden address@hidden/ViewARCH--tez--0.0.1 - Tez; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00247.html (5,029 bytes)
153. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Keywords in commit log? (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:34:47 +0200; I use it to note the flavour of my commit, i.e. 'merge', 'bugfix', ... If I want to have a look at only the merges, I can search by keyword; using grep, or a tool like Perspective or ViewARCH. Note t; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00080.html (4,932 bytes)
154. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: a contrib directory (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:49:51 +0200; Possibly true, but what if tla-contrib--devo--1.1 contained a configs/ dir itself, with a config for each part? configs/ cvs2arch.contrib bash-completion.contrib ... viewarch.contrib perspective.cont; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-08/msg00529.html (7,454 bytes)
155. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] future of the wiki (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:45:05 -0400; I quite like this idea. Given a revision library and ViewArch on the server, you also get diffs between revisions like on the wiki. However, to protect ourselves from potential vandalism, I think it; /archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-08/msg00286.html (5,140 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 155
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]