avr-libc-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #5799] error(?) in iom162.h


From: nobody
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #5799] error(?) in iom162.h
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:05:34 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1

=================== BUG #5799: LATEST MODIFICATIONS ==================
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=5799&group_id=2140

Changes by: Theodore A. Roth <address@hidden>
Date: Fri 10/17/03 at 10:05 (US/Pacific)

            What     | Removed                   | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Category | Library                   | Header
         Assigned to | None                      | troth




=================== BUG #5799: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================


Submitted by: None                    Project: AVR C Runtime Library        
Submitted on: Tue 10/07/03 at 23:58
Category:  Header                     Severity:  5 - Major                  
Bug Group:  None                      Resolution:  None                     
Assigned to:  troth                   Originator Email:  address@hidden     
Status:  Open                         

Summary:  error(?) in iom162.h

Original Submission:  In definitions for UCSR0A: bit 2 is defined as PE0, this 
should be UPE0. In definitions for UCSR1A: bit 2 is defined as PE1, this should 
be UPE1. This according to datasheet for Atmega162(V) rev: 2513E-AVR-09/03



I guess this is the reson why PORTE bits are defined as PORTE0, PORTE1.... 
instead of PE0, PE1.. as would be normal.



I am usign WinAVR-20030913



No Followups Have Been Posted


CC list is empty


No files currently attached


For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=5799&group_id=2140

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]