[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing)
From: |
Nardy Pillards |
Subject: |
Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing) |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jul 2003 20:36:43 +0200 |
From: "Holger" <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 8:09 PM
> At 19:54 10.07.2003 +0200, Nardy Pillards wrote:
> >From: "Holger" <address@hidden>
> >Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:27 PM
> > > Which external.c are you talking of? The one from branch-multi? Here
this
> > > compiles well as it is in CVS. But procunits.c not, though. See thread
> > > "Compile gnubg-multi on Windows".
> >
> >external.c does not compile here.
>
> Ah, of course, you're trying with HAVE_SOCKETS?
Yes. And both devel-013 and branch-multi.
Devel-013 to read the random data from www.random.org,
branch-multi for 'local communication'.
> Olivier, does the local communication also require sockets? If not we
could
> try to build for multiprocessor systems first.
I don't have a multiprocessor, so I am going for the HAVE_SOCKETS.
> >2. ExternalRead (line 149) and ExternalWrite (line 196) both want SIGPIPE
> >I can't find SIGPIPE in MinGW 2
>
> Yes. There isn't.
>
> Regards,
>
> Holger
Nardy
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing, Olivier Baur, 2003/07/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing, Joern Thyssen, 2003/07/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing, Nardy Pillards, 2003/07/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing, Nardy Pillards, 2003/07/08
- [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing quickstart webpage and Mac OS X binary, Olivier Baur, 2003/07/08
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Olivier Baur, 2003/07/09
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Nardy Pillards, 2003/07/09
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Holger, 2003/07/10
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Nardy Pillards, 2003/07/10
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Holger, 2003/07/10
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing),
Nardy Pillards <=
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Holger, 2003/07/11
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Holger, 2003/07/11
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Olivier Baur, 2003/07/11
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Nardy Pillards, 2003/07/11
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Holger, 2003/07/11
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Olivier Baur, 2003/07/11
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Holger, 2003/07/11
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Holger, 2003/07/11
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Jim Segrave, 2003/07/09
- Re: Bug-gnubg] Winsock (Was: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing), Nardy Pillards, 2003/07/09