Well.... what
> should be the image for the eval button? What about the image for the
> rollout button? What should be the image for the MWC button? (I'm
> designing
> a image for "Move") What should be the image for the Show button? (An
eye,
> maybe?)
Just two things which are not unimportant in my opinion:
- I think the Move button should be removed. I think it is superfluous.
I have never found a single instance where I might consider using it.
Seeing a move is done with the Show button and that's fine, but a Move
button? If I really want to play one of the analyzed moves my instinct
has always been to do it myself. I have seen some friends who are now
power-users of gnubg and thus highlight a number of interesting issues.
This is one they have agreed upon.
- I'd be careful about replacing some things such as the ply-numbers by
icons. The reason is that 1, 2, 3, etc. require no further explanation
other than they represent 1 ply, 2 plies, etc. If you replace them with
an icon whose function is not *immediately* obvious it will cause
problems of usage. It isn't even enough to create logical images, as