I'll check it later, just on the way to the office.
Ciao
Achim
Am 11.11.2008 um 12:43 schrieb Christian Anthon: Today's snapshot appears to be broken. Achim? Christian. On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Zulli, Louis P < address@hidden> wrote:
Thanks, Christian. I was about to download and build the latest snapshot,
but stopped when I saw that the reported size of the file was much smaller
than usual:
11-Nov-2008 04:33 3.4M
Is the snapshot file corrupted?
Louis
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:15:53 +0100
"Christian Anthon" <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Louis,
I found the problem, it should be fixed in the source now.
Christian.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Christian Anthon
<address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Louis,
it is a bug in the code that finds legal targets for moving a chequer
(gnubg basically interprets your move as 3/2 2/off) . The bug was
already there in 0.14, but nobody noticed until now, since I recently
fixed a bug in the "click and move" code by adding a check for legal
targets.
Christian.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Zulli, Louis P <address@hidden>
wrote:
I created the attached position to demonstrate a gnubg behavior that
perplexes me. I have not attempted to isolate the exact feature of the
position that triggers this behavior, but perhaps this one example will
suffice for now. I do not know if this is a bug, or a feature whose
necessity escapes me.
I roll 3-1 in the attached position. I click on the stone on my 3-point,
and
it is borne off. I click on the stone on my 2-point, and it won't move!
(Actually, it wobbles in place.) I need to drag it to the 1-point, even
though it can only go there. Why? What am I missing?
Louis
PS---In the same position, if I click first on the stone on the 2-point,
it
moves to the 1-point. If I then click on the other stone, it is borne
off.
So the order of the actions matters.
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list address@hiddenhttp://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
|