[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: serverboot
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: serverboot |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:50:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 09:58:53AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu> writes:
>
> > ufs-fsck is fsck for ufs, I belive that bsdfsck is the same thing only
> > rewritten.
> >
> > I mean the other way of course, ufs-fsck is a rewritten version of
> > bsdfsck. Please correct me if this _not_ the case.
>
> You are correct. bsdfsck is the baseline source, more or less, and it
> should be left around because it's an important reference point.
If removing it, first it should be made sure that whatever version stays
around works on the Hurd. In particular that it deals with the Hurd
extensions properly.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
- Re: serverboot, (continued)
Re: serverboot, Philip Charles, 2002/12/17
Re: serverboot, M. Gerards, 2002/12/18
Re: serverboot, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/18
- Re: serverboot, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/18
- Re: serverboot, Jeff Bailey, 2002/12/18
- Re: serverboot, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Jeff Bailey, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/19