[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cvs2cl
From: |
Bryce McKinlay |
Subject: |
Re: cvs2cl |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Nov 2000 13:25:09 +1300 |
Tom Tromey wrote:
> I noticed that Brian regenerated ChangeLog using cvs2cl yesterday.
> This made it much less readable, imho.
I agree. Generated cvs changelogs suck. The main problem is that its
difficult to specify different text for different groups of changed files
without doing multiple check-ins. People also tend to write more interesting
and useful entries when the ChangeLog is maintained by hand.
1 vote for a hand maintained ChangeLog.
[ bryce ]
- cvs2cl, Tom Tromey, 2000/11/20
- Re: cvs2cl,
Bryce McKinlay <=
- Re: cvs2cl, Mark Wielaard, 2000/11/23