[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.security
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: java.security |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 08:10:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:36:02AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> We've used Cryptix with libgcj before. The Cryptix is BSD-like but is
> probably not compatible with the GPL or LGPL. But I think it probably
> is compatible with the GPL+exception that libgcj uses.
How is it not compatible with the GPL?
>From <http://www.cryptix.org/docs/license.html>:
Cryptix General License
Copyright 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000
The Cryptix Foundation Limited. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the copyright notice,
this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE CRYPTIX FOUNDATION LIMITED AND
CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING,
BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
CRYPTIX FOUNDATION LIMITED OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT,
INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
(INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING
IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
- java.security, Brian Jones, 2000/12/18
- Re: java.security, Mark Benvenuto, 2000/12/19
- Re: java.security, Tom Tromey, 2000/12/19
- Re: java.security, Brian Jones, 2000/12/19
- Re: java.security,
Mark Wielaard <=
- Re: java.security, Tom Tromey, 2000/12/20
- Re: java.security, Brian Jones, 2000/12/20
- Re: java.security, Bryce McKinlay, 2000/12/20
- Re: java.security, Tom Tromey, 2000/12/20
- Re: java.security, Mark Benvenuto, 2000/12/21
Re: java.security, Brian Jones, 2000/12/19