[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05]
From: |
John Leuner |
Subject: |
Re: 0.05 Update [was Re: 0.05] |
Date: |
28 Jan 2003 11:39:54 +0000 |
> > 722 ignore supported timeout... 2002-Nov-26 10:10 mark
> > 728 fixes to sorting arrays 2002-Nov-26 11:08 jewel
>
> With no objections these patches will not be integrated before the
> release.
Julian, do you have any more information about these patches? I looked
at the various documentation for SO_TIMEOUT on my Debian system and
didn't see any mention of it. But it also didn't say that it isn't
supported.
Is the patched behaviour necessary for JRVM to work correctly?
I tried to generate a case where the current sorting routines break (by
generating random sequences), but I never once got it to fail. Would it
be difficult for you to repeat the process where you got Eclipse to
fail?
John Leuner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part