[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes'
From: |
Brian Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes' |
Date: |
02 Mar 2003 11:13:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
"Jeroen Frijters" <address@hidden> writes:
> > P.S Why the HTML email with font size=tiny?
> > Did someone complain that they couldn't read the plain text version?
>
> Yeah, sorry about that. I recently switched to using an MS Exchange 2003
> server with Outlook 2003 (both beta versions) and I haven't been able to
> figure out what causes that. I'm sending plain text mails, but the mail
> header contains a MIME-Version and Content-Type header and I'm guessing
> that the listserv software generates the HTML based on that.
Seems like Emacs GNUs handles it okay. I have a similar problem with
Outlook at work; despite being set to send plain text email it sends
the email in two MIME parts. One part is plain text and the second is
HTML. Outlook sucks.
Brian
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Jeroen Frijters, 2003/03/02
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes',
Brian Jones <=
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Archie Cobbs, 2003/03/03