[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit
From: |
Sven de Marothy |
Subject: |
Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:25:33 +0100 |
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 16:10 +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Sven de Marothy wrote:
>
> > So more recently, I started looking into using something like JavaCC to
> > create a proper parser. (Although I haven't gotten further with that
> > either.)
>
> Unless Sun's parser generator has surprisingly recently switched away
> from Sun's funny but broken non-nuclear BSD, or as Sun calls it, BSD+,
> to a sane license while I wasn't looking[0], I'd recommend using ANTLR
> for proper parsers, as it's in the public domain, well maintained and is
> already used successfully by gjdoc.
Note the 'something like'-part.. :) And yes, the ambiguous and poor
licensing situation is a good reason not to use JavaCC.
/Sven
- javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Sven de Marothy, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Dalibor Topic, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit,
Sven de Marothy <=
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Dalibor Topic, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Mark Wielaard, 2005/03/04
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/04
Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/03