[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: japi and public references to non-public types
From: |
Jeroen Frijters |
Subject: |
RE: japi and public references to non-public types |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 16:18:29 +0200 |
Stuart Ballard wrote:
> On 10/5/05, Jeroen Frijters <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Possibly. Maybe we can use annotations (in the -- hopefully near --
> > future) to mark code that differs from Sun for a valid reason?
>
> Perhaps I have too little faith in my fellow developers, but this idea
> scares me ;)
As long as you list the annotations in the report (in a special
section), I don't see any problems.
> So far I haven't seen any situations where we need to differ from Sun
> that aren't detectable and ignorable by japi without needing
> annotations...
What about the NameImpl issue?
Regards,
Jeroen
- Re: japi and public references to non-public types, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: japi and public references to non-public types, Stuart Ballard, 2005/10/05
- Re: japi and public references to non-public types, Tom Tromey, 2005/10/05
- Re: japi and public references to non-public types, Tom Tromey, 2005/10/07
- Re: japi and public references to non-public types, Stuart Ballard, 2005/10/07
- Re: japi and public references to non-public types, Tom Tromey, 2005/10/07
- Re: japi and public references to non-public types, Mark Wielaard, 2005/10/07
- Re: japi and public references to non-public types, Tom Tromey, 2005/10/07
RE: japi and public references to non-public types, Jeroen Frijters, 2005/10/05
RE: japi and public references to non-public types,
Jeroen Frijters <=