[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unicode support
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: Unicode support |
Date: |
23 Jul 2001 17:56:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0 |
>>>>> "WL" == Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
WL> What you are talking about is Unicode level 1. But to properly
WL> support Indic languages more things have to be done. Even simple
WL> combining characters will have to be represented differently,
WL> AFAIK.
For info, what needs to be done essentially differently for these
languages compared with existing support in Emacs?
For what it's worth, I did try a trivial proof of concept for Unicode
support (as I understand it) of Thai, based on thai-util.el and
post-read conversion. As far as I could tell, it treated the level 2
example in Kühn's demo text correctly, but Mule-UCS is the only thing
against which I can compare.
- Re: Unicode support (was: null-device), Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/18
- Re: Unicode support, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/07/18
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/18
- Re: Unicode support, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode support, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode support, Kai Großjohann, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode support,
Dave Love <=
- Re: Unicode support, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/25
- Re: Unicode support, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/25
- Re: Unicode support, Miles Bader, 2001/07/25
- Re: Unicode support, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/07/25