[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:48:02 -0500 |
! The string argument is normally a multibyte string, except:
! - if the process' input coding system is no-conversion or raw-text,
! it is a unibyte string (the non-converted input), or else
Is this really the right way for it to work?
Should the choice of unibyte or multibyte string
be tied in this way to the choice of coding system?
If you want multibyte strings "without decoding", would emacs-mule
give you that?
Handa and Eli, what do you think?
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/18
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/18
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/19
- unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/19
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/20
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/20
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/20
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/20
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Richard Stallman, 2003/01/22