[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Instead of pcase
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Instead of pcase |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Dec 2023 06:51:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> Choosing an new syntax should be possible (indeed, somebody
> posted a link to a similar construct in Racket which is more
> wordy), but then those who don't like high-level constructs
> probably won't like it either.
We had a very long and unpleasant discussion, now people are
instead working on things they think will be an improvement.
And maybe it will be, at least to those people! So let's leave
it at that for now perhaps, regardless of whatever it is
a much more constructive approach.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: Instead of pcase,
Emanuel Berg <=