[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2]
From: |
Robert Anderson |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] |
Date: |
12 Sep 2003 08:25:03 -0700 |
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 08:09, address@hidden wrote:
> Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Why do you want to do that? The history is still there, and accessible
> > through CVS like it always was. You've not "lost" anything to just
> > import your latest sources and go from there.
>
> Because I don't want to have to use 2 tools to access my project's
> history.
You already know CVS and that's the way you would have done it anyway.
I don't see any "loss" there.
> I also want "annotate" support and I want it to be able to give me useful
> info for history that predates migration to arch. etc.
One possible way to do this is the other way around - through CVS, until
the migration boundary is sufficiently removed from where you are
working.
Commit to CVS with each arch commit, preferably with a trigger. Use CVS
for annotate when the boundary is an issue.
> If history is not integrated, then, for all practical purposes, it
> might as well be lost.
I went through exactly the same process you're going through, and I
expended a lot of effort with the same preconceived idea that my history
was "lost" if I didn't redundantly copy it into arch somehow. It turned
out to be a huge time sink, and for basically nothing. My humble
advice: just import and start working. If and when you have a real
show-stopper due to the format boundary, work on it then.
Bob
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], John Goerzen, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], duchier, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], duchier, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], Robert Anderson, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], duchier, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], wave++, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], duchier, 2003/09/12
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], Denys Duchier, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2],
Robert Anderson <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage, Florian Weimer, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], John Goerzen, 2003/09/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs *huge* memory usage, John Goerzen, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2], Robert Collins, 2003/09/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, Tez Kamihira, 2003/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2, Jonas Diemer, 2003/09/09