[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:53:08 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Robert Collins <address@hidden>
> On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 05:18, Tom Lord wrote:
> > But good examples of why I'm wrong with that hypothesis are welcome,
> > of course.
> A java project, that wants to treat .class (.o) files as excluded, but
> also recieves some .class files from elsewhere to link into jars - but
> without the source. They may even be arbitrarily mixed in amongst the
> code they have source for, and unable to split them out via configs.
But untagged-source does a pretty good job with that, no? Those class
files which are tagged are source, those that aren't are something
else.
-t
- [OT] lisp (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans), (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Florian Weimer, 2003/09/18
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15