[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:52:15 +0200 (CEST) |
On 19 Sep 2003, Miles Bader wrote:
> Pau Aliagas <address@hidden> writes:
> > > So: Why have two words for two concepts when one will do? :)
> >
> > That's what I propose, leave it as is as it causes no confusion.
>
> Even if you were never confused, it _does_ cause confusion -- I was
> certainly confused on that particular point when I first started using
> arch.
>
> > We could move file-tag to file-id, as suggested, but that would be more
> > confusing as you have to use "arch-tag" inside a file. Should we move it
> > too to "file-id"?
>
> In fact, it is likely that `arch-tag:' will be replaced by `arch-id:'
> (it's necessary to use a new name for other reasons, and that seems to
> be the leading contender).
In that case let's keep sound and coherent. If we decide to use id, let's
move everything to id, otherwise let's just correct the few misleading
cases.
> > I'm not opposed to normalizing commands, but in this case I dont find it
> > necessary.
>
> But I presume you won't be excessively bothered if it is changed for
> the benefit of others (in particular, new users of tla)?
Not at all, I'm just making a stonger opinion of these friendly
discussions :)
Pau
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] get-patch/show-changeset -> inconsistent or no?, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/18
- [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id,
Pau Aliagas <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Zack Brown, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19