[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Inertia on lkml?
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Inertia on lkml? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:56:35 +0200 (CEST) |
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Tom Lord wrote:
> Doesn't it seem that nobody may do so, legally (or at least without
> risking legal challenge), other than BitMover and (perhaps, I don't
> know one way or the other) their paying customers -- at least not if
> they intend to tell us the results for purposes of helping
> development.
There are good news about using arch in the Linux kernel development and
I'm sure we'll hear about them RSN.
One important developer is already trying it :) And more will surely
folllow, they won't resist the arch spell.
Pau
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: log-buf-len dynamic (fwd), Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Adam Spiers, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Inertia on lkml?,
Pau Aliagas <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Momchil Velikov, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/25
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/24