[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?
From: |
Samium Gromoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:12:02 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.11.7 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At 26 Sep 2003 10:58:25 +0900,
Miles Bader wrote:
>
> Zack Brown <address@hidden> writes:
> > Arch is still filled with controversial features, though.
>
> A bit strong I think. If tla can deliver the goods feature-wise, I
> think your average kernel hacker (and especially someone as practical as
> Linus) will get over any initial distaste with `{arch}' and
> branch-naming conventions pretty quickly, and get down to business.
>
> The two things that still bother me about tla for large trees like the
> kernel are:
>
> (1) Using individual files for explicit tags
>
> (2) No cheap/merge-friendly way of switching tagging styles en-masse
> (e.g. explicit -> tagline)
(3) Can not send modifications to Linus as GNU patches.
(because handling -/+ renames in the light of accepting
side modifying the target file complicates things)
> I see both of these as being fairly tractable problems though (in that I
> think I could implement solutions without too much trouble).
>
> The previous entry on this list was of course `what-change/commit is
> butt slow on large trees' but the inode-state hack seems to have solved
> that problem.
>
> -Miles
> --
> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
regards, Samium Gromoff
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Adam Spiers, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?,
Samium Gromoff <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Robin Farine, 2003/09/26
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: log-buf-len dynamic (fwd), Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/26