[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call
From: |
John Goerzen |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:29:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:48:36PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> > I have not run a checkin on this tree since Tom added the inode cache to
> > tla, so I don't have complete stats for you yet. I'll let you know once
> > cscvs is ready.
>
> I presume you're using names or explicit? The inode-signature
> optimization won't help you (yet).
Explicit, yes. Bummer. (I haven't been following those discussions closely
enough to know what the optimization does.)
In that case, I think "tla commit" on a 2.5 source tree was taking about a
minute on a 2.0GHz P4 Xeon.
-- John
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, John Goerzen, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, John Goerzen, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, John Goerzen, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, John Goerzen, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers,
John Goerzen <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Charles Duffy, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, John Goerzen, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30