[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions? |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:51:36 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Pau Aliagas <address@hidden>
> ,,patchset and its contents do not appear in the index files.
Since they are not source, that is hardly surprising.
> Although they an be useful to archive browsers, I don't think we should
> keep redundant information if we can avoid it.
Um..... what do you think a revlib is, sparse or otherwise?
> If we talk about really big
> projects like the linux kernel, this would mean thousands of useless
> files and inodes.
Don't worry about that. "Useless" is wrong and the implied
optimization (saving inodes) is not even "premature" -- simply
"silly".
-t