gnu-arch-users (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Wed Dec 31 22:40:02 2003 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• December 31, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Charles Duffy, 22:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, James Blackwell, 22:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Aaron Bentley, 22:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Colin Walters, 20:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Tom Lord, 17:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Brian May, 17:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Tom Lord, 17:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla-rsync-mirror, Andrew Suffield, 16:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Miles Bader, 15:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Tom Lord, 15:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Tom Lord, 15:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Miles Bader, 15:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Aaron Bentley, 15:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Andrew Suffield, 15:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Tom Lord, 13:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Florian Weimer, 13:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Tom Lord, 12:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, James Blackwell, 12:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Charles Duffy, 11:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Aaron Bentley, 11:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Andrew Suffield, 11:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Andrew Suffield, 11:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Florian Weimer, 10:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Robert Collins, 10:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Robert Collins, 10:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Aaron Bentley, 10:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Aaron Bentley, 10:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Andrew Suffield, 09:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Momchil Velikov, 04:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Momchil Velikov, 04:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Tom Lord, 03:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Dustin Sallings, 02:33
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Libraries and changesets, Aaron Bentley, 02:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Tom Lord, 02:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Dustin Sallings, 01:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, James Blackwell, 01:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Karl Waclawek, 00:46
• December 30, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tar as filesystem, Miles Bader, 21:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tar as filesystem, Robert Collins, 20:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Conflicts/*.rej files, Rob Weir, 20:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Dustin Sallings, 20:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tar as filesystem, Jochen Schaeuble, 20:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Dustin Sallings, 20:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tar as filesystem, Miles Bader, 20:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Andrew Suffield, 17:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Karl Waclawek, 15:08
  • [Gnu-arch-users] "tla tag" writes in local directory, Samuel Tardieu, 13:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tar as filesystem, Jan Hudec, 13:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Tom Lord, 12:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Momchil Velikov, 10:42
  • [Gnu-arch-users] library-add got confused, Samuel Tardieu, 10:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Samuel Tardieu, 10:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Reverting local changes, Aaron Bentley, 09:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Reverting local changes, Steve Folta, 06:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Reverting local changes, Dustin Sallings, 06:39
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Reverting local changes, Steve Folta, 05:59
• December 29, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] interaction between signing rules and direct mirror access, Tom Lord, 23:19
  • [Gnu-arch-users] interaction between signing rules and direct mirror access, Miles Bader, 22:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] crypto support for mirrors at http://mirrors.sourcecontrol.net, James Blackwell, 21:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Miles Bader, 21:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto features and 1.2preX, Andrew Suffield, 20:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] revision lock problems (with, Tom Lord, 20:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] revision lock problems (with, Miles Bader, 20:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] revision lock problems (with, Tom Lord, 20:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] revision lock problems (with, Miles Bader, 19:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto features and 1.2preX, Jason McCarty, 18:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Tom Lord, 18:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Tar as filesystem, Aaron Bentley, 14:43
  • [Gnu-arch-users] crypto features and 1.2preX, Tom Lord, 14:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] bug: cat-log doesn't handle full revision names properly, Aaron Bentley, 13:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] revision lock problems (with, Tom Lord, 12:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] revision lock problems (with, Miles Bader, 11:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tla & Proftpd, Mark A. Flacy, 01:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] sftp error handling, Aaron Bentley, 01:32
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Tla & Proftpd, Carl Humphrey, 01:25
• December 28, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] per-archive IDs, James Blackwell, 23:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Suggestions for handling in pfs-sftp.c?, Aaron Bentley, 22:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ftp troubles, Carl Humphrey, 22:14
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to get changes against merged version?, Samuel Tardieu, 22:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ftp troubles, Carl Humphrey, 21:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ftp troubles, Stig Brautaset, 21:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ftp troubles, Robert Collins, 21:44
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to get changes against merged version?, Samuel Tardieu, 21:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ftp troubles, Robert Collins, 21:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] How to get changes against merged version?, Samuel Tardieu, 21:04
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ftp troubles, Stig Brautaset, 20:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] integrity checks for revision libraries, Brian May, 20:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ftp troubles, Steve Folta, 20:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Robert Collins, 20:13
  • [Gnu-arch-users] ftp troubles, Carl Humphrey, 19:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Conflicts/*.rej files, Florian Weimer, 19:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Conflicts/*.rej files, Brian May, 19:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Brian May, 19:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Tom Lord, 15:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] per-archive IDs, Tom Lord, 14:55
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Conflicts/*.rej files, Samuel Tardieu, 08:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Florian Weimer, 07:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [PATCH] per-archive IDs, James Blackwell, 02:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [PATCH] per-archive IDs, Charles Duffy, 01:04
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] per-archive IDs, Charles Duffy, 00:04
• December 27, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Tom Lord, 22:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Graham Hughes, 21:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Miles Bader, 21:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, James Blackwell, 21:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Conflicts/*.rej files, Miles Bader, 21:02
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Conflicts/*.rej files, Brian May, 20:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Brian May, 19:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Partap, 19:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Revision lock problems, Robert Collins, 19:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Revision lock problems, Mark A. Flacy, 19:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Revision lock problems, Partap, 18:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Colin Walters, 16:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Tom Lord, 12:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Florian Weimer, 12:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Tom Lord, 12:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Robert Collins, 10:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Andrew Suffield, 09:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Jan Hudec, 06:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Adam Sampson, 04:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Idea for a feature, James Blackwell, 00:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Andrew Suffield, 00:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Idea for a feature, Tom Lord, 00:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, James Blackwell, 00:16
• December 26, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Idea for a feature, James Blackwell, 23:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Tom Lord, 23:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Andrew Suffield, 23:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Idea for a feature, Robert Collins, 23:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Idea for a feature, Tom Lord, 22:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Idea for a feature, James Blackwell, 21:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Miles Bader, 21:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Florian Weimer, 20:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Idea for a feature, Robert Collins, 20:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Thomas Zander, 20:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Some good news, James Blackwell, 20:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Robert Collins, 19:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Mark A. Flacy, 19:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Andrew Suffield, 19:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Robert Collins, 19:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Brian May, 18:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Brian May, 18:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Tom Lord, 17:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attribute tracking, Ollivier Robert, 17:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, James Blackwell, 16:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Tom Lord, 15:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Tom Lord, 15:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Johannes Berg, 15:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Tom Lord, 15:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, James Blackwell, 15:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Johannes Berg, 14:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and bookmark maintenance, David Allouche, 14:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, James Blackwell, 14:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Johannes Berg, 13:28
  • RE: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Parker, Ron, 09:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Robert Collins, 09:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attribute tracking, Johannes Berg, 08:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Johannes Berg, 08:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Florian Weimer, 07:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Thomas Zander, 07:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Thomas Zander, 07:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Thomas Zander, 07:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Florian Weimer, 06:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Florian Weimer, 06:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] update: tree has no common history with version, Robert Collins, 03:37
  • [Gnu-arch-users] update: tree has no common history with version, David Lichteblau, 03:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Robert Collins, 00:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Robert Collins, 00:49
• December 25, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Miles Bader, 23:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Tom Lord, 22:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Tom Lord, 22:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Miles Bader, 22:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Miles Bader, 22:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Tom Lord, 22:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, James Blackwell, 22:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Tom Lord, 22:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Miles Bader, 22:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Miles Bader, 21:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Robert Collins, 21:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Robert Collins, 21:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUGlet] Automatic changelog in 1.2, Edouard Gomez, 21:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fish vs sftp -- not the same, folks., Miles Bader, 20:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fish vs sftp -- not the same, folks., Jan Hudec, 20:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Miles Bader, 20:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Jan Hudec, 20:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Tom Lord, 19:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Andrew Suffield, 18:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attribute tracking, Brian May, 17:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla--devo--1.2 has preliminary gpg stuff, Tom Lord, 17:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Charles Duffy, 17:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Thomas Zander, 16:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] fish vs sftp -- not the same, folks., Charles Duffy, 16:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Charles Duffy, 16:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Tom Lord, 16:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Thomas Zander, 15:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Feature suggestion: "tla inventory -0", Charles Duffy, 15:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, James Blackwell, 13:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Thomas Zander, 13:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, James Blackwell, 12:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] using `gcc -M' instead of parsing `gcc -E' to produce dependencies in package-framework, Tom Lord, 12:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Andrew Suffield, 12:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Idea for a feature, James Blackwell, 12:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Thomas Zander, 08:19
  • [Gnu-arch-users] using `gcc -M' instead of parsing `gcc -E' to produce dependencies in package-framework, Stig Brautaset, 08:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Miles Bader, 07:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Miles Bader, 07:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attribute tracking, Johannes Berg, 05:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] checksum files -- off by one error, Thomas Zander, 05:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attribute tracking, Thomas Zander, 05:13
  • [Gnu-arch-users] sftp rename?, Thomas Zander, 05:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla archive-fixup doesn't entirely work, Tom Lord, 01:40
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla archive-fixup doesn't entirely work, Miles Bader, 01:32
• December 24, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] checksum files -- off by one error, Robert Collins, 22:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] checksum files -- off by one error, Tom Lord, 22:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] checksum files -- off by one error, Johannes Berg, 22:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] checksum files -- off by one error, Tom Lord, 22:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attribute tracking, Johannes Berg, 22:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] checksum files -- off by one error, Johannes Berg, 22:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attribute tracking, Tom Lord, 21:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attribute tracking, Johannes Berg, 21:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attribute tracking, Tom Lord, 21:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] extended attribute tracking, Johannes Berg, 21:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 19:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Miles Bader, 18:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 18:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Error handling updates, Thomas Zander, 16:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Error handling updates, Aaron Bentley, 15:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Problem when adding symlink to directory, Charles Duffy, 14:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: undo for single files?, Stig Brautaset, 14:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Error handling updates, Thomas Zander, 13:50
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Arch mirror site, James Blackwell, 13:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Error handling updates, Thomas Zander, 13:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Error handling updates, Aaron Bentley, 13:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, James Blackwell, 12:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Error handling updates, James Blackwell, 12:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] log template, Johannes Berg, 12:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] log template, Johannes Berg, 12:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Aaron Bentley, 11:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Tom Lord, 11:44
  • [Gnu-arch-users] log template, Johannes Berg, 11:37
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Error handling updates, Aaron Bentley, 09:43
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Problem when adding symlink to directory, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 07:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Dustin Sallings, 03:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, James Blackwell, 01:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Dustin Sallings, 00:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, James Blackwell, 00:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Johannes Berg, 00:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Dustin Sallings, 00:08
• December 23, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] trying out todays debian build, Johannes Berg, 23:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, James Blackwell, 23:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Dustin Sallings, 22:36
  • [Gnu-arch-users] -Wall -Werror, Robert Collins, 22:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Directory rename with names tagging, Robert Collins, 22:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] undo for single files?, Johannes Berg, 22:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 22:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 21:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Mark A. Flacy, 21:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 21:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Directory rename with names tagging, Robert Anderson, 19:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 19:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 18:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Directory rename with names tagging, James Blackwell, 18:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Wiki usefulness, Geert Stappers, 18:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 18:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: PFS access to revision library? (Was: Re: bad permissions when adding revisions to the library), Pau Aliagas, 18:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 17:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tupshin Harper, 15:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Directory rename with names tagging, James Blackwell, 15:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 15:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PFS access to revision library? (Was: Re: bad permissions when adding revisions to the library), Jan Hudec, 15:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 15:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PFS access to revision library? (Was: Re: bad permissions when adding revisions to the library), Aaron Bentley, 15:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PFS access to revision library? (Was: Re: bad permissions when adding revisions to the library), Jan Hudec, 14:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PFS access to revision library? (Was: Re: bad permissions when adding revisions to the library), Tom Lord, 14:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Charles Duffy, 14:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 13:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Aaron Bentley, 13:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Directory rename with names tagging, Robin Farine, 12:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, conrad, 11:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Directory rename with names tagging, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 11:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Directory rename with names tagging, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 11:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Directory rename with names tagging, Robin Farine, 11:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] bad permissions when adding revisions to the library, Pau Aliagas, 10:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Directory rename with names tagging, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 10:13
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 10:05
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), michael josenhans, 09:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] bad permissions when adding revisions to the library, Jan Hudec, 09:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] bad permissions when adding revisions to the library, Pau Aliagas, 09:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] bad permissions when adding revisions to the library, Jan Hudec, 09:08
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 09:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] bad permissions when adding revisions to the library, Pau Aliagas, 08:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] bad permissions when adding revisions to the library, Pau Aliagas, 08:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] bad permissions when adding revisions to the library, Jan Hudec, 08:42
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Directory rename with names tagging, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 08:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] bad permissions when adding revisions to the library, Jan Hudec, 08:42
  • [Gnu-arch-users] PFS access to revision library? (Was: Re: bad permissions when adding revisions to the library), Jan Hudec, 08:36
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 06:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 05:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Robin Farine, 05:25
  • [Gnu-arch-users] bad permissions when adding revisions to the library, Pau Aliagas, 04:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Momchil Velikov, 04:27
• December 22, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 23:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 23:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 23:01
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Generic data/validation formats [Was Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?], Tupshin Harper, 22:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 22:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 22:50
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Generic data/validation formats [Was Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?], Charles Duffy, 22:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 22:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Charles Duffy, 22:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 22:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 22:24
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 22:17
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 22:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 22:06
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 21:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 21:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 21:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 21:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 21:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 21:14
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 21:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 21:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 20:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 20:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 20:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 20:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 20:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 20:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 19:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Charles Duffy, 19:42
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 19:40
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 19:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 19:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Charles Duffy, 18:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Charles Duffy, 18:52
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 18:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sln: checkin/commit, vrsnd. changesets, Daniel's style, Tom Lord, 18:49
  • [Gnu-arch-users] sln: checkin/commit, vrsnd. changesets, Daniel's style, Brian May, 18:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 16:25
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 15:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 15:14
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 14:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 14:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 14:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 14:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 14:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 14:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 13:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 12:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 11:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 11:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 11:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new in tla-1.2 -- nothing!, Tom Lord, 11:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 10:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 10:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 10:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 10:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 10:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 09:06
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 09:06
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 08:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new in tla-1.2 -- nothing!, Florian Weimer, 07:43
• December 21, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 22:54
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 22:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] new in tla-1.2 -- nothing!, Tom Lord, 22:24
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 20:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] following branched branches, Tom Lord, 15:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 12:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 12:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 12:23
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 12:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 11:58
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 11:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 10:26
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 10:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 09:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 08:49
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Automatically registering unknown archives in tla grab, Samuel Tardieu, 08:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extra help line, Robert Collins, 08:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Extra help line, Samuel Tardieu, 08:19
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and bookmark maintenance, michael josenhans, 06:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Collecting scripts for a proposed contrib/ directory, James Blackwell, 03:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: one more feature needed for signing, Robert Collins, 02:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: one more feature needed for signing, Robert Collins, 02:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] following branched branches, Dustin Sallings, 00:14
• December 20, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] following branched branches, Robert Collins, 22:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] following branched branches, Dustin Sallings, 21:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] new archive, Tom Lord, 18:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG?] meta-data, Robin Farine, 10:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: regressions in 1.1, Samuel Tardieu, 08:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: regressions in 1.1, Robert Collins, 08:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: regressions in 1.1, Samuel Tardieu, 06:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] trying out todays debian build, Johannes Berg, 06:15
  • [Gnu-arch-users] octopy rpms - arch has a menuitem, , 06:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] regressions in 1.1, Robert Collins, 03:24
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] flame-fest, Tom Lord, 02:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] flame-fest, Stephen J. Turnbull, 02:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cronnable cscvs imports, Robert Collins, 01:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Robert Collins, 01:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Andrew Suffield, 01:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla ignore, Robert Collins, 01:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cronnable cscvs imports, Andrew Suffield, 00:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG?] meta-data, Robert Collins, 00:56
• December 19, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cronnable cscvs imports, Robert Collins, 23:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cronnable cscvs imports, James Blackwell, 23:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] cronnable cscvs imports, Robert Collins, 23:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 22:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 22:17
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Wiki usefulness, Samuel A. Falvo II, 22:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 21:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Andrew Suffield, 21:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Andrew Suffield, 21:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 21:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 20:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 20:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Andrew Suffield, 20:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 19:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 19:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 19:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Andrew Suffield, 18:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 18:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Robert Collins, 18:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 18:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Andrew Suffield, 18:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Andrew Suffield, 17:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 17:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 17:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 17:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Andrew Suffield, 17:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] mirrored archive screwup, Tom Lord, 17:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] mirrored archive screwup, Gurupartap Davis, 17:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.1 rpms, , 16:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 16:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 16:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 16:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] trying out todays debian build, Jan Hudec, 16:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] still around, talli somekh, 16:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 15:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 15:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 15:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Andrew Suffield, 15:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Wiki usefulness, Michael Grubb, 15:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Tom Lord, 14:48
  • [Gnu-arch-users] trying out todays debian build, Johannes Berg, 14:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Wiki usefulness, Geert Stappers, 14:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Changing cmd-grab.c:find_latest_revision into ????:arch_find_latest_revision, Tom Lord, 14:28
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] arch speedups on big trees, Chris Mason, 14:13
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Changing cmd-grab.c:find_latest_revision into ????:arch_find_latest_revision, James Blackwell, 14:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library locations, Tom Lord, 14:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Tom Lord, 13:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 12:25
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Wiki usefulness, Michael Grubb, 11:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 10:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and bookmark maintenance, , 09:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] library locations, Pau Aliagas, 09:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 09:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Andrew Suffield, 08:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and bookmark maintenance, Andrew Suffield, 08:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and bookmark maintenance, Andrew Suffield, 08:50
  • [Gnu-arch-users] BUG in tla explicit-default --dont-care, Pau Aliagas, 07:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Marco Zühlke, 07:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Anselm Lingnau, 06:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [TLATOR] Stabilization + updates, Mark A. Flacy, 06:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 03:51
• December 18, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Changing cmd-grab.c:find_latest_revision into ????:arch_find_latest_revision, James Blackwell, 23:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, James Blackwell, 23:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Tom Lord, 22:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Dustin Sallings, 22:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, James Blackwell, 22:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, James Blackwell, 21:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Dustin Sallings, 21:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] zsh completion for tla 1.1 now available, Jason McCarty, 21:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Charles Duffy, 21:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, James Blackwell, 21:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Robert Collins, 20:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Charles Duffy, 20:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 19:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, James Blackwell, 19:04
  • [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 18:54
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and bookmark maintenance, michael josenhans, 18:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-1.1 build failure solaris, Tom Lord, 17:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and bookmark maintenance, Aaron Bentley, 17:42
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Samuel A. Falvo II, 17:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Andrew Suffield, 17:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Charles Duffy, 17:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and bookmark maintenance, Andrew Suffield, 17:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Tom Lord, 16:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Jason McCarty, 16:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Tom Lord, 16:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and bookmark maintenance, , 16:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-1.1 build failure solaris, Neal D. Becker, 15:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-1.1 build failure solaris, Tom Lord, 15:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Andrew Suffield, 15:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] flame-fest, Tom Lord, 15:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Tom Lord, 14:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Tom Lord, 14:15
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: A test failure on AIX, John Goerzen, 13:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Tom Lord, 13:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] A test failure on AIX, John Goerzen, 13:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] candidate1 configure problems, John Goerzen, 13:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] dopatch deletes non-empty directories, Robin Farine, 13:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-1.1 build failure solaris, Stig Brautaset, 13:03
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: candidate1 configure problems, Samuel Tardieu, 12:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] dopatch deletes non-empty directories, Jan Hudec, 12:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Stephen J. Turnbull, 11:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-1.1 build failure solaris, Neal D. Becker, 11:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-1.1 build failure solaris, Neal D. Becker, 11:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-1.1 build failure solaris, Ollivier Robert, 10:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] dopatch deletes non-empty directories, Robin Farine, 10:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-1.1 build failure solaris, Stig Brautaset, 10:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-1.1 build failure solaris, Ollivier Robert, 10:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla-1.1 build failure solaris, Neal D. Becker, 10:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] flame-fest, Stephen J. Turnbull, 08:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Michael Alan Dorman, 08:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Jan Hudec, 07:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Support for static builds of tla?, Ollivier Robert, 05:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Andrew Suffield, 03:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Andrew Suffield, 03:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Dustin Sallings, 02:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: candidate1 configure problems, Ollivier Robert, 02:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Charles Duffy, 02:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] --date, Dustin Sallings, 01:36
• December 17, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 22:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Tom Lord, 20:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [semi-OffTopic] UserLinux, Tom Lord, 20:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] A test failure on AIX, John Goerzen, 20:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: candidate1 configure problems, Daniel Néri, 20:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] A test failure on AIX, Tom Lord, 18:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] candidate1 configure problems, Tom Lord, 18:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] A test failure on AIX, John Goerzen, 17:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] candidate1 configure problems, James Blackwell, 17:38
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Prospective temporary bug tracking system, James Blackwell, 17:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] candidate1 configure problems, John Goerzen, 17:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Miles Bader, 16:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tupshin Harper, 16:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tupshin Harper, 16:19
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Error handling, Aaron Bentley, 16:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG?] meta-data, Robin Farine, 16:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 16:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 15:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Thomas Zander, 15:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Miles Bader, 15:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Error handling, Tom Lord, 15:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tupshin Harper, 15:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Miles Bader, 15:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Error handling, Aaron Bentley, 15:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (no subject), James Blackwell, 14:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, James Blackwell, 13:41
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 13:38
  • [Gnu-arch-users] (no subject), Tom Lord, 13:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 13:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 13:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 13:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Charles Duffy, 13:04
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 13:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 12:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 12:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Mark Thomas, 12:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 12:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 12:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and bookmark maintenance, Andrew Suffield, 12:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Undoing a replay, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 12:35
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 12:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Charles Duffy, 12:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 12:28
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 12:25
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 12:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 12:11
  • [Gnu-arch-users] speaking of libraries, Tom Lord, 12:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 12:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 11:32
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and bookmark maintenance, Pau Aliagas, 11:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Aaron Bentley, 10:43
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Support for static builds of tla?, Charles Duffy, 10:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and bookmark maintenance, Aaron Bentley, 10:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG?] meta-data, Robin Farine, 10:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla ignore, Neal D. Becker, 10:14
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 09:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 08:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] A separate mailing list for tlator?, Samium Gromoff, 08:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 07:42
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG?] meta-data and archive libraries, Robin Farine, 07:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Colin Walters, 07:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, David Allouche, 06:06
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Pau Aliagas, 05:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Robin Farine, 05:06
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Dustin Sallings, 04:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and bookmark maintenance, Thomas Zander, 04:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Pau Aliagas, 04:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Changelog and branches, David Allouche, 04:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Benjamin Bytheway, 01:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and bookmark maintenance, Andrew Suffield, 00:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Andrew Suffield, 00:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Andrew Suffield, 00:32
• December 16, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Miles Bader, 22:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Dustin Sallings, 22:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 21:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] arch and bookmark maintenance, , 21:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 21:25
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Miles Bader, 20:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 19:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Alexander Deruwe, 19:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Robert Collins, 18:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 18:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, James Blackwell, 18:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.1 announcement, Tom Lord, 18:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.1 announcement, Tom Lord, 18:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] branching in shell arch vs. tla question (PLEASE!), , 18:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Undoing a replay, Robert Anderson, 18:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] branching in shell arch vs. tla question (PLEASE!), Robert Anderson, 18:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] branching in shell arch vs. tla question (PLEASE!), , 17:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] branching in shell arch vs. tla question (PLEASE!), Charles Duffy, 17:52
  • [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Robert Collins, 17:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] branching in shell arch vs. tla question (PLEASE!), Aaron Bentley, 17:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] branching in shell arch vs. tla question (PLEASE!), Jason McCarty, 17:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, proposed extensions (was: take 1), Andrew Suffield, 17:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] branching in shell arch vs. tla question (PLEASE!), , 17:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.1 announcement, Dustin Sallings, 17:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.1 announcement, Neal D. Becker, 16:48
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.1 announcement, Tom Lord, 15:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] A separate mailing list for tlator?, James Blackwell, 09:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, James Blackwell, 09:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Undoing a replay, James Blackwell, 09:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, proposed extensions (was: take 1), Jan Hudec, 06:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Jan Hudec, 06:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Undoing a replay, Harald Meland, 05:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Samium Gromoff, 05:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Samium Gromoff, 05:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [TLATOR] Stabilization + updates, Samium Gromoff, 05:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 02:42
• December 15, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 20:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Miles Bader, 19:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 18:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, take 1, James Blackwell, 18:44
  • [Gnu-arch-users] pika-0.1pre5 (numerics scaffolding), Tom Lord, 17:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Aaron Bentley, 16:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [configure] test for diff/diff3, Tom Lord, 16:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Andrew Suffield, 16:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 16:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [configure] test for diff/diff3, Ollivier Robert, 16:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Tom Lord, 15:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [configure] test for diff/diff3, Ollivier Robert, 15:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [configure] test for diff/diff3, Thomas Gerigk, 15:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Aaron Bentley, 15:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Undoing a replay, Robert Anderson, 14:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Tom Lord, 14:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Colin Walters, 14:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Andrew Suffield, 13:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, proposed extensions (was: take 1), Andrew Suffield, 13:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [configure] test for diff/diff3, Tom Lord, 12:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [configure] test for diff/diff3, Tom Lord, 12:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Tom Lord, 12:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Changelog and branches, Tom Lord, 12:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Clark McGrew, 12:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Tom Lord, 11:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Undoing a replay, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 11:28
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Undoing a replay, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 11:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Thomas Zander, 10:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [TLATOR] Stabilization + updates, Scott Barron, 10:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Jan Hudec, 10:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, proposed extensions (was: take 1), Jan Hudec, 09:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Samium Gromoff, 09:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Thomas Zander, 09:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Changelog and branches, Samium Gromoff, 08:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc), Samium Gromoff, 08:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [configure] test for diff/diff3, Christian von Kietzell, 07:32
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [RFC] Naming conventions, Samium Gromoff, 06:56
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [TLATOR] Stabilization + updates, Samium Gromoff, 06:31
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [configure] test for diff/diff3, Ollivier Robert, 05:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Changelog and branches, Jason McCarty, 04:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 04:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-1.1 RELEASE CANDIDATE and "heads up"s, Jason McCarty, 04:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] for 1.1: 64-bit rx cache size fix., Robert Collins, 04:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] for 1.1: 64-bit rx cache size fix., Robert Collins, 04:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Changelog and branches, Samium Gromoff, 03:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-1.1 RELEASE CANDIDATE and "heads up"s, James Blackwell, 03:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: name of `backup' inventory type, Robert Collins, 03:38
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: name of `backup' inventory type, Miles Bader, 03:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Andrew Suffield, 03:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-1.1 RELEASE CANDIDATE and "heads up"s, Jason McCarty, 03:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Andrew Suffield, 03:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] name of `backup' inventory type, Robert Collins, 03:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, James Blackwell, 02:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 01:35
  • [Gnu-arch-users] name of `backup' inventory type, Miles Bader, 00:47
• December 14, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] branching in shell arch vs. tla question, Tom Lord, 20:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] branching in shell arch vs. tla question, , 20:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Tom Lord, 19:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-1.1 RELEASE CANDIDATE and "heads up"s, James Blackwell, 19:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Tom Lord, 19:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Robert Collins, 19:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-1.1 RELEASE CANDIDATE and "heads up"s, Jason McCarty, 19:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Colin Walters, 19:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Colin Walters, 19:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Robert Collins, 19:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Miles Bader, 18:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.1 inode, Tom Lord, 18:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Colin Walters, 18:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Robert Collins, 18:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Colin Walters, 18:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Colin Walters, 18:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Colin Walters, 18:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Miles Bader, 17:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Robert Collins, 17:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Charles Duffy, 17:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Andrew Suffield, 16:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.1 inode, Karel Gardas, 16:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, James Blackwell, 16:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Colin Walters, 16:26
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.1 inode, Benjamin Bytheway, 16:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 15:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 1.1 feature freeze, Tom Lord, 15:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla-1.1 RELEASE CANDIDATE and "heads up"s, Tom Lord, 15:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 1.1 feature freeze, Pau Aliagas, 15:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Looking for references ( Was: [arch-users] diagnosing svn), Tom Lord, 14:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Looking for references ( Was: [arch-users] diagnosing svn), Thaddeus L. Olczyk, 14:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Tom Lord, 13:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Miles Bader, 07:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 05:08
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tls rpms if interested, also tkdiff package, and a question, , 04:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Andrew Suffield, 01:17
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Automatic archive discovery, take 1, Andrew Suffield, 00:45
• December 13, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "virtual" archives in arch, Andrew Suffield, 21:01
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 1.1 feature freeze, Miles Bader, 20:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "virtual" archives in arch, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 20:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Tom Lord, 20:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] one more feature needed for signing, Robert Collins, 20:36
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: User-defined "macro" commands, Miles Bader, 20:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 19:32
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 1.1 feature freeze, Tom Lord, 19:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "virtual" archives in arch, Charles Duffy, 19:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "virtual" archives in arch, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 19:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Mark Thomas, 18:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 18:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Mark Thomas, 18:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] one more feature needed for signing, Jason McCarty, 18:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Debian builds of tla, Eduardo Pérez Ureta, 17:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 17:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "virtual" archives in arch, Tom Lord, 17:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Dustin Sallings, 17:31
  • [Gnu-arch-users] one more feature needed for signing, Tom Lord, 17:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "virtual" archives in arch, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 17:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (volunteers?) crypto signatures for arch, Robert Collins, 17:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Robert Collins, 17:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Debian builds of tla, Jade Rubick, 16:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "virtual" archives in arch, Charles Duffy, 16:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] "virtual" archives in arch, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 16:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 15:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (volunteers?) crypto signatures for arch, Andrew Suffield, 14:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Tom Lord, 14:02
  • [Gnu-arch-users] User-defined "macro" commands, Mark Thomas, 13:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] svn signatures (was Re: [...] crypto signatures for arch), Tom Lord, 12:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (volunteers?) crypto signatures for arch, Tom Lord, 12:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 12:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 12:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Roman Zippel, 09:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (volunteers?) crypto signatures for arch, Thomas Zander, 05:17
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Considering Semantics with a simple but stupid file archive format., Eric W. Biederman, 04:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Robert Collins, 04:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Eric W. Biederman, 04:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (volunteers?) crypto signatures for arch, Robert Collins, 04:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Robert Collins, 04:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Robert Collins, 03:04
• December 12, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Daily Debian builds are available again, Andrew Suffield, 23:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Robert Collins, 23:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Aaron Bentley, 23:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Colin Walters, 22:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Changelog and branches, David Allouche, 22:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [patch] New rbrowse command for tla, Miles Bader, 21:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [patch] New rbrowse command for tla, James Blackwell, 21:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Robert Collins, 20:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Andrew Suffield, 19:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Colin Walters, 19:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, James Blackwell, 19:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Thomas Zander, 18:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Tom Lord, 18:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] small annoyance with new library stuff, Miles Bader, 18:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [patch] New rbrowse command for tla, Miles Bader, 18:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Miles Bader, 18:23
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 1.1 feature freeze, Miles Bader, 18:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, James Blackwell, 18:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Ollivier Robert, 18:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Ollivier Robert, 18:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Andreas Fuchs, 18:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Tom Lord, 17:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Tom Lord, 17:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Christopher Dale, 16:50
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 1.1 feature freeze, Pau Aliagas, 15:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Karl Waclawek, 15:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Tom Lord, 14:56
  • [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Tom Lord, 14:51
  • [Gnu-arch-users] more nails in pristines coffin, Tom Lord, 14:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: `tla file-find' doesn't work without pristine trees, Tom Lord, 12:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] small annoyance with new library stuff, Tom Lord, 12:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [patch] New rbrowse command for tla, Tom Lord, 12:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Eric W. Biederman, 12:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Mark A. Flacy, 12:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Changelog and branches, Stig Brautaset, 10:56
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Changelog and branches, Edouard Gomez, 10:41
• December 11, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [patch] Fixes for rbrowse and grab, James Blackwell, 23:03
  • Re: config/test-suite tasks, anyone? Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Andrew Suffield, 21:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Andrew Suffield, 21:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Tom Lord, 20:26
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [patch] New rbrowse command for tla, James Blackwell, 20:11
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Andreas Fuchs, 20:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Scott Barron, 19:37
  • config/test-suite tasks, anyone? Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Tom Lord, 18:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Samuel Tardieu, 18:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Tom Lord, 18:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Tom Lord, 18:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Bruce Stephens, 18:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Robert Collins, 17:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Bruce Stephens, 17:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Bruce Stephens, 17:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Robert Collins, 17:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Roman Zippel, 17:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: An attempt at an ITLA implementation, Andreas Fuchs, 16:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Mark Thomas, 16:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pure-merge is impossible (was Re: Star merging with 3 branches), Robert Collins, 16:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 15:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pure-merge is impossible (was Re: Star merging with 3 branches), Tom Lord, 15:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Samuel Tardieu, 14:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pending merges, Andrew Suffield, 14:56
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] diagnosing svn, Thaddeus L. Olczyk, 14:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pure-merge is impossible (was Re: Star merging with 3 branches), Andrew Suffield, 14:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Tom Lord, 14:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Tom Lord, 14:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Tom Lord, 14:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] An attempt at an ITLA implementation, Andreas Rottmann, 14:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fatal bug in tla?, Samuel Tardieu, 13:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pure-merge is impossible (was Re: Star merging with 3 branches), Tom Lord, 13:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Bruce Stephens, 13:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] An attempt at an ITLA implementation, Tom Lord, 13:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Tom Lord, 13:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Tom Lord, 13:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Fatal bug in tla?, Samuel Tardieu, 13:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] signing and push-mirror, Tom Lord, 12:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pending merges, Tom Lord, 12:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 12:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Andrew Suffield, 11:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Bruce Stephens, 11:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Roman Zippel, 11:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Karel Gardas, 11:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Mark A. Flacy, 10:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Aaron Bentley, 09:38
  • [Gnu-arch-users] An attempt at an ITLA implementation, Andreas Rottmann, 09:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Karel Gardas, 08:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Bruce Stephens, 08:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Roman Zippel, 07:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Jan Hudec, 06:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Peter Conrad, 05:55
  • [Gnu-arch-users] signing and push-mirror, Robert Collins, 03:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pending merges, Robert Collins, 02:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Robert Collins, 02:33
• December 10, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Colin Walters, 23:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 23:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Mark A. Flacy, 23:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pending merges, Tom Lord, 22:52
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch lkml, Miles Bader, 21:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Roman Zippel, 20:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, David Brown, 20:06
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] responsibilities of the human society, Roman Zippel, 18:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] How to ignore a subdirectory, Robert Anderson, 18:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Tom Lord, 18:05
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to ignore a subdirectory, Marc Martinez, 17:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] How to ignore a subdirectory, James Blackwell, 17:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] How to ignore a subdirectory, Robert Collins, 17:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Thomas Zander, 16:56
  • [Gnu-arch-users] How to ignore a subdirectory, John Seifarth, 16:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Robert Collins, 16:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Thomas Zander, 15:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pure-merge is impossible (was Re: Star merging with 3 branches), Andrew Suffield, 15:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Aaron Bentley, 15:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Aaron Bentley, 14:42
  • [Gnu-arch-users] pure-merge is impossible (was Re: Star merging with 3 branches), Tom Lord, 14:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml, Eric W. Biederman, 13:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to back out a change, David Allouche, 12:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to back out a change, David Allouche, 11:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Aaron Bentley, 10:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Robert Collins, 08:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Andrew Suffield, 08:30
• December 09, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] More patches for tla grab, James Blackwell, 23:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] flame-fest, Tom Lord, 22:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] flame-fest, Evan Powers, 21:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Tom Lord, 21:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Robert Collins, 20:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Joshua Haberman, 20:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Charles Duffy, 20:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Aaron Bentley, 19:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Tom Lord, 18:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Robert Collins, 18:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Joshua Haberman, 18:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to back out a change, Tom Lord, 18:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs?, Andrew Suffield, 17:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Tom Lord, 17:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Tom Lord, 17:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Tom Lord, 17:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Robert Anderson, 16:15
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] flame-fest, Tom Lord, 15:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Aaron Bentley, 15:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Jan Hudec, 15:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to back out a change, Mark A. Flacy, 14:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs?, Charles Duffy, 14:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star merging with 3 branches, Jan Hudec, 14:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs?, Tom Lord, 13:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to back out a change, David Allouche, 07:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to back out a change, David Allouche, 07:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to back out a change, Samium Gromoff, 07:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [TLATOR] Status report, Samium Gromoff, 06:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs?, David Allouche, 06:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: `tla file-find' doesn't work without pristine trees, Bruce Stephens, 06:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Paul Hedderly, 04:53
  • Re: crypto signatures for arch/another proposal [was: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (volunteers?) crypto signatures for arch], Paul Hedderly, 04:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto sigs and _Encryption_ for arch, Paul Hedderly, 04:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] flame-fest, Stephen J. Turnbull, 01:51
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [patch] pfs support for tla grab, James Blackwell, 00:41
• December 08, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [patch] Update pfs-dav to handle HTTP_PROXY in addition to http_proxy, Robert Collins, 23:33
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [patch] Update pfs-dav to handle HTTP_PROXY in addition to http_proxy, James Blackwell, 23:19
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: `tla file-find' doesn't work without pristine trees, Robert Collins, 23:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Correctly handle missing trailing slash in http_pr