[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fd leak
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fd leak |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:59:40 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:00:43PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
>
>
> > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
>
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:50:24PM -0800, Dustin Sallings wrote:
> > > During the brief death of savannah, someone had brought up a bugzilla
> > > system. Would it be desirable to use that instead? This thing seems
> a
> > > little lacking.
>
> > I agree the savannah bug system sucks, but there's a pretty big
> advantage to
> > using a system that's maintained in central, reliable (well, on `GNU
> time' as
> > Tom puts it, but you can generally assume that the FSF isn't going to
> go away
> > tomorrow) place that's pretty easy for people to find.
>
> > Morever, while bugzilla seems a bit better than the savannah bug
> tracker, it
> > has the same fundamentall problem: it's extremely web centric, which
> makes it
> > a address@hidden pain to deal with for many common uses. If arch (or
> savannah;
> > ideally, all of savannah could move to something better) was to go to
> the
> > trouble of adopting another bug tracker, it would be very nice if it was
> > something that had a sane email interface, as submitting/dealing with
> bug via
> > email is generally much, much, much easier.
>
>
> Jeeze, yes. I don't know about lucratively -- but
> ...uh.... spiritually at least, a little email-driven database
> suitable for mapping issue onto would be a _hugely_ killer app. It
> keeps coming to the top of my agenda but then getting blown back but
> "nah, let's start Pika instead" and the like.
Obligatory mention: debbugs does pretty much everything you
want. Unfortunately, it's debbugs. Bloody thing.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature