[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support
From: |
Neil Stevens |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:44:52 -0800 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday January 18, 2004 2:59 pm, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 17:06, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Colin,
> > Tom is right, we can do better.
> >
> > I've reversed out your change. Please do the following:
> >
> > stuff the sha1's on a stack (or even cat to a big string :}) as they
> > are created, and flush that to the file when closing and processing.
>
> Dude, ugh. Are you serious? Why are we worrying so much about tla
> 1.2pre0? In just a few weeks after everyone's upgraded to 1.2 final, we
> will have all completely forgotten about the issue.
Maybe people are worrying about 1.2pre0 because they'd like to be able to
get people who do real work with tla to test when 1.3pre0 comes around.
- --
Neil Stevens - address@hidden
"It's snowing, it's snowing! God, I hate this weather."
They Might Be Giants, __New York City__
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFADa9kf7mnligQOmERAhksAJ49NMcvW/950ziKifTTBxNikL7LjACfZX7S
0IGkT3o5WN1NrvnGrUDsG+A=
=5Lm6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Gnu-arch-users] sha1 support, Robert Collins, 2004/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support, Colin Walters, 2004/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support, Robert Collins, 2004/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support, Tom Lord, 2004/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support, Colin Walters, 2004/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support, Robert Collins, 2004/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support, Tom Lord, 2004/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support, Colin Walters, 2004/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support, Robert Collins, 2004/01/20
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: sha1 support,
Neil Stevens <=