[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:57:08 -0800 (PST) |
> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:54:57 -0500
> Cc: Tom Lord <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
> Blat: Foop
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
> mail.42inc.com
> X-Spam-DCC: dcc.uncw.edu: mail 1201; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
autolearn=ham
> version=2.61
> X-42email-MailScanner-Information: Please contact
http://www.42inc.com/support.html for more information.
> X-42email-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-UIDL: 4292a77c3fa8ab77682c4c8e009f88b2
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:54:31PM +0000, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Reorder `category--branch--version' to `category--version--branch'. If
we
> > are popularising microbranches they *are* subordinal to versions, unlike
> > the unrelated cartesian space that Tom has referred to before.
>
> Christ man, _no they're not_.
>
> All this crap (and specifically the above crap) was argued ad-nauseum on
this
> list a few months ago, and I have no wish to repeat the experience.
>
> Look it up.
>
You put that so much more directly than I dare too :-)
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, David Allouche, 2004/01/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Tom Lord, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Mark Thomas, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, James Blackwell, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Jeremy Shaw, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Tom Lord, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Benjamin Bytheway, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Miles Bader, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Scott Bronson, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Scott Bronson, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Miles Bader, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Miles Bader, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Mark Thomas, 2004/01/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, James Blackwell, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Tom Lord, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, David Allouche, 2004/01/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/28