gnugo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] 3.5.3 vs 3.5.4


From: Paul Pogonyshev
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] 3.5.3 vs 3.5.4
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:45:17 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.6.50

max-d wrote:
> 
> A- i wrote
> 
> > i had done such a match with board-size 13,i got
> >
> > gnugo 3_5_4 82
> > gnugo_3.4 88
> 
> B- SP Lee pointed  out some 3-5-4's mistakes
> 
> C- I had run a lot of games which showed that 3-5-3 did better than    3.4
> vs Handtalk
> 
> I tried to verify things with an other match (size 13 level 10)
> 
> = gnugo353 91
> = gnugo_3_5_4 67
> 
> almost 57%
> Seems that something was broken in gnugo_3_5_4

List of patches that can be theoritically responsible for something
bad between 3.5.3 and 3.5.4:

paul_5_4.2a.    A simple followup to paul_5_4.2 below.
arend_5_4.3.    Break-in code now uses new cache. (very unlikely)
splee_5_4.1b.   Revision of estimate_lunch_eye_value(). Supercedes
                splee_5_4.1a. Revision of splee_5_4.1. Semeai tweak.
paul_5_4.2.     Semeai patch.
paul_5_4.1.     Seki code improvements. (very unlikely)
gunnar_5_4.7.   Tuning. (large patch)
martin_5_4.1b.  Revision of martin_5_4.1a. Revision of martin_5_4.1.
                Owl tuning. (might waste node, don't know counters)
evan_5_4.2a.    Revision of evan_5_4.2. Tuning. (hardly)
gunnar_5_4.1.   Tuning. (very good breakage -- unlikely)
arend_5_4.1.    Breakin fix. (very unlikely)

Not too many candidates.  Anyone wants to check?  The main problem
is to determine on what to check.

Paul




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]