[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed? |
Date: |
15 May 2001 12:52:16 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
[ moved to guile-devel ]
Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> BTW, roots for gc would also allow us to get rid of the scm_sys_protects
> array and thus allow to put the corresponding definitions at the places
> where they belong.
I'll implement it, then. (tomorrow, probably).
some questions:
should I make scm_register_root nest like scm_protect?
should I provide two sets of functions instead, one nesting and the
other not?
do you share my dislike of the name `scm_protect'? I think it's not
very clear, it should be `scm_protect_from_gc' or somesuch.
--
OS's and GUI's come and go, only Emacs has lasting power.
-- Per Abrahamsen
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?,
Michael Livshin <=