[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sanity.sh patch
From: |
Donald Sharp |
Subject: |
Re: sanity.sh patch |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:34:11 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.4i |
touch --
test importc[Line 5186] -
# If I'm correctly reading the Single Unix Specification,
# version 2, then "touch -t 197107040343" or "touch -t 203412251801"
# should work. But GNU touch seems to have other ideas.
# I sort of wonder if this is lossage by the standards bodies,
# I'm not sure.
# Note that some versions of touch when used without -t don't handle
# y2k and/or set the seconds reliably.
# We should probably find a different way of doing this.
touch 0704034371 bdir/subdir/file1
touch 1225180134 cdir/cfile
touch was creating files called 0704034371 and 1225180134. Which
were causing the test to fail.
I just poked around some more.
sanity.sh was picking up touch from:
/usr/ucb/touch
I imagine that you are using /usr/bin/touch, but I made
mine pick up touch from my ~/bin directory( which is gnu ).
donald
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 03:20:54PM -0500, Larry Jones wrote:
> Donald Sharp writes:
> >
> > sanity.sh uses features of 'touch' and 'sed' that are gnu
> > specific( at least they don't seem to work too well on my non
> > gnu toolchain sun box here ).
>
> I don't see anything GNU specific and the nightly testing works just
> fine on SunOS 5.6 (Solaris 2.6?) with the system touch and sed. Could
> you be a bit more specific about the problems you're seeing?
>
> -Larry Jones
>
> I'm a genius. -- Calvin
- sanity.sh patch, Donald Sharp, 2000/11/03
- Re: sanity.sh patch, Larry Jones, 2000/11/03
- Re: sanity.sh patch,
Donald Sharp <=
- Re: sanity.sh patch, Larry Jones, 2000/11/03
- Re: sanity.sh patch, Donald Sharp, 2000/11/03
- Re: sanity.sh patch, Larry Jones, 2000/11/03
- Re: sanity.sh patch, Donald Sharp, 2000/11/03
- Re: sanity.sh patch, Larry Jones, 2000/11/03
Re: sanity.sh patch, Derek R. Price, 2000/11/03