[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags)
From: |
Derek R. Price |
Subject: |
Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags) |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:11:46 -0500 |
Donald Sharp wrote:
> Here are some sample cvs history -T output(s):
>
> T 2000-11-29 15:21 +0000 sharpd bar.c 1.3 [d:A]
> T 2000-11-29 15:21 +0000 sharpd foo.c 1.1 [d:A]
> T 2000-11-29 15:21 +0000 sharpd bar.c 1.4 [b:M]
> T 2000-11-29 15:22 +0000 sharpd bar.c [b:D]
> T 2000-11-29 15:22 +0000 sharpd foo.c [b:D]
>
> Is this ok? What do people think?
Oh, and you should come up with a new record type besides 'T' so that histories
won't have to be reset once this change goes in and scripts will be able to
easily
distinguish between an old record type and a new one without counting fields.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:address@hidden OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
116. (A)bort, (R)etry, (P)retend this never happened...
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), (continued)
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Larry Jones, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Derek R. Price, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Donald Sharp, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Derek R. Price, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Larry Jones, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Derek R. Price, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Donald Sharp, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Laine Stump, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Mike Sutton, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Derek R. Price, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags),
Derek R. Price <=
Re: hitory of the tags, Pierre Asselin, 2000/11/27
Re: hitory of the tags, Christian Brechbuehler, 2000/11/27