[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: File permissions
From: |
Paul Sander |
Subject: |
Re: File permissions |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Sep 2001 02:50:44 -0700 |
>--- Forwarded mail from address@hidden
>[ On Tuesday, September 25, 2001 at 17:06:43 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: File permissions
>>
>> There's nothing wrong with adding meta-data.
>Well, it all depends on what the meta data is, and what use is made of
>it by the overall system.
>Where the needs of the versioning tool conflict with the needs of the
>target system, an intermediate process must be used to separate the
>meta-data so that the conflict does not occur.
I think that's what I said in the following paragraphs of that posting:
Store data that describe the data, don't encode the process.
>--- End of forwarded message from address@hidden
- Re: File permissions, (continued)
- Re: File permissions, Tobias Brox, 2001/09/25
- Re: File permissions, Paul Sander, 2001/09/25
- Re: File permissions, Larry Jones, 2001/09/25
- Re: File permissions, Greg A. Woods, 2001/09/26
- Re: File permissions, Tobias Brox, 2001/09/26
- Re: File permissions, Greg A. Woods, 2001/09/26
Extending CVS without breaking RCS ,v files, Frederic Brehm, 2001/09/25
Re: File permissions, Eric Siegerman, 2001/09/25
Re: File permissions, Greg A. Woods, 2001/09/26
Re: File permissions, Tobias Brox, 2001/09/26
Re: File permissions, Greg A. Woods, 2001/09/26
Re: File permissions, yap_noel, 2001/09/26