qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] i386: Add notify VM exit support


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i386: Add notify VM exit support
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:17:19 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/2.1.5 (2021-12-30)

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 05:02:05PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> There are cases that malicious virtual machine can cause CPU stuck (due
> to event windows don't open up), e.g., infinite loop in microcode when
> nested #AC (CVE-2015-5307). No event window means no event (NMI, SMI and
> IRQ) can be delivered. It leads the CPU to be unavailable to host or
> other VMs. Notify VM exit is introduced to mitigate such kind of
> attacks, which will generate a VM exit if no event window occurs in VM
> non-root mode for a specified amount of time (notify window).
> 
> A new KVM capability KVM_CAP_X86_NOTIFY_VMEXIT is exposed to user space
> so that the user can query the capability and set the expected notify
> window when creating VMs.
> 
> If notify VM exit happens with VM_INVALID_CONTEXT, hypervisor should
> exit to user space with the exit reason KVM_EXIT_NOTIFY to inform the
> fatal case. Then user space can inject a SHUTDOWN event to the target
> vcpu. This is implemented by defining a new bit in flags field of
> kvm_vcpu_event in KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS ioctl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
> ---
>  hw/i386/x86.c         | 24 ++++++++++++++++++
>  include/hw/i386/x86.h |  3 +++
>  target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
> index b84840a1bb..25e6c50b1e 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/x86.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
> @@ -1309,6 +1309,23 @@ static void machine_set_sgx_epc(Object *obj, Visitor 
> *v, const char *name,
>      qapi_free_SgxEPCList(list);
>  }
>  
> +static void x86_machine_get_notify_window(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> +                                const char *name, void *opaque, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(obj);
> +    int32_t notify_window = x86ms->notify_window;
> +
> +    visit_type_int32(v, name, &notify_window, errp);
> +}
> +
> +static void x86_machine_set_notify_window(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> +                               const char *name, void *opaque, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(obj);
> +
> +    visit_type_int32(v, name, &x86ms->notify_window, errp);
> +}
> +
>  static void x86_machine_initfn(Object *obj)
>  {
>      X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(obj);
> @@ -1319,6 +1336,7 @@ static void x86_machine_initfn(Object *obj)
>      x86ms->oem_id = g_strndup(ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6, 6);
>      x86ms->oem_table_id = g_strndup(ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME8, 8);
>      x86ms->bus_lock_ratelimit = 0;
> +    x86ms->notify_window = -1;
>  }

IIUC from the kernel patch, this negative value leaves the protection
disabled, and thus the host remains vulnerable to the CVE. I would
expect this ought to set a suitable default value to fix the flaw.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]