We have several limitations and bugs worth fixing; they are
inter-related enough that it is not worth splitting this patch into
smaller pieces:
* ".5k" should work to specify 512, just as "0.5k" does
* "1.9999k" and "1." + "9"*50 + "k" should both produce the same
result of 2048 after rounding
* "1." + "0"*350 + "1B" should not be treated the same as "1.0B";
underflow in the fraction should not be lost
* "7.99e99" and "7.99e999" look similar, but our code was doing a
read-out-of-bounds on the latter because it was not expecting ERANGE
due to overflow. While we document that scientific notation is not
supported, and the previous patch actually fixed
qemu_strtod_finite() to no longer return ERANGE overflows, it is
easier to pre-filter than to try and determine after the fact if
strtod() consumed more than we wanted. Note that this is a
low-level semantic change (when endptr is not NULL, we can now
successfully parse with a scale of 'E' and then report trailing
junk, instead of failing outright with EINVAL); but an earlier
commit already argued that this is not a high-level semantic change
since the only caller passing in a non-NULL endptr also checks that
the tail is whitespace-only.
Fixes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1629
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
---
tests/unit/test-cutils.c | 51 +++++++++++------------
util/cutils.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
@@ -246,27 +244,66 @@ static int do_strtosz(const char *nptr, const char **end,
retval = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- } else if (*endptr == '.') {
+ } else if (*endptr == '.' || (endptr == nptr && strchr(nptr, '.'))) {
/*
* Input looks like a fraction. Make sure even 1.k works
- * without fractional digits. If we see an exponent, treat
- * the entire input as invalid instead.
+ * without fractional digits. strtod tries to treat 'e' as an
+ * exponent, but we want to treat it as a scaling suffix;
+ * doing this requires modifying a copy of the fraction.
*/
- double fraction;
+ double fraction = 0.0;
- f = endptr;
- retval = qemu_strtod_finite(f, &endptr, &fraction);
- if (retval) {
+ if (retval == 0 && *endptr == '.' && !isdigit(endptr[1])) {
+ /* If we got here, we parsed at least one digit already. */
endptr++;
- } else if (memchr(f, 'e', endptr - f) || memchr(f, 'E', endptr - f)) {
- endptr = nptr;
- retval = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
} else {
- /* Extract into a 64-bit fixed-point fraction. */
+ char *e;
+ const char *tail;
+ g_autofree char *copy = g_strdup(endptr);
+
+ e = strchr(copy, 'e');
+ if (e) {
+ *e = '\0';
+ }
+ e = strchr(copy, 'E');
+ if (e) {
+ *e = '\0';
+ }
+ /*
+ * If this is a floating point, we are guaranteed that '.'
+ * appears before any possible digits in copy. If it is
+ * not a floating point, strtod will fail. Either way,
+ * there is now no exponent in copy, so if it parses, we
+ * know 0.0 <= abs(result) <= 1.0 (after rounding), and
+ * ERANGE is only possible on underflow which is okay.
+ */
+ retval = qemu_strtod_finite(copy, &tail, &fraction);
+ endptr += tail - copy;
+ }
+
+ /* Extract into a 64-bit fixed-point fraction. */
+ if (fraction == 1.0) {
+ if (val == UINT64_MAX) {
+ retval = -ERANGE;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ val++;
+ } else if (retval == -ERANGE) {
+ /* See comments above about underflow */
+ valf = 1;
+ retval = 0;
+ } else {
valf = (uint64_t)(fraction * 0x1p64);
}
}
+ if (retval) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (memchr(nptr, '-', endptr - nptr) != NULL) {
+ endptr = nptr;
+ retval = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
c = *endptr;
mul = suffix_mul(c, unit);
if (mul > 0) {