[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] qapi: provide a friendly string representation of QAPI cl
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] qapi: provide a friendly string representation of QAPI classes |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Oct 2023 14:02:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.9 (2022-11-12) |
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 02:37:45PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > If printing a QAPI schema object for debugging we get the classname and
> > a hex value for the instance:
> >
> > <qapi.schema.QAPISchemaEnumType object at 0x7f0ab4c2dad0>
> > <qapi.schema.QAPISchemaObjectType object at 0x7f0ab4c2dd90>
> > <qapi.schema.QAPISchemaArrayType object at 0x7f0ab4c2df90>
> >
> > With this change we instead get the classname and the human friendly
> > name of the QAPI type instance:
> >
> > <QAPISchemaEnumType:CpuS390State at 0x7f0ab4c2dad0>
> > <QAPISchemaObjectType:CpuInfoS390 at 0x7f0ab4c2dd90>
> > <QAPISchemaArrayType:CpuInfoFastList at 0x7f0ab4c2df90>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changed in v3:
> >
> > - Retain the object hex ID in the new representation
> >
> > scripts/qapi/schema.py | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/qapi/schema.py b/scripts/qapi/schema.py
> > index 231ebf61ba..39c11bb52a 100644
> > --- a/scripts/qapi/schema.py
> > +++ b/scripts/qapi/schema.py
> > @@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ def __init__(self, name: str, info, doc, ifcond=None,
> > features=None):
> > self.features = features or []
> > self._checked = False
> >
> > + def __repr__(self):
> > + if self.name is not None:
> > + return "<%s:%s at 0x%x>" % (type(self).__name__, self.name,
> > id(self))
> > + else:
> > + return "<%s at 0x%x>" % (type(self).__name__, id(self))
> > +
> > def c_name(self):
> > return c_name(self.name)
>
> Looks good now.
>
> Except I generally prefer
>
> if COND:
> SUITE1
> else:
> SUITE2
>
> over
>
> if not COND:
> SUITE2
> else:
> SUITE1
>
> because it avoids mental double-negation.
>
> Mind if I swap things? Like so:
>
> def __repr__(self):
> if self.name is None:
> return "<%s at 0x%x>" % (type(self).__name__, id(self))
> else:
> return "<%s:%s at 0x%x>" % (type(self).__name__,
> self.name, id(self))
Sure, fine with me.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|