qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] target/i386/kvm: call kvm_put_vcpu_events() before kvm_put_n


From: Eiichi Tsukata
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/i386/kvm: call kvm_put_vcpu_events() before kvm_put_nested_state()
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 02:09:40 +0000

FYI: The EINVAL in vmx_set_nested_state() is caused by the following condition:
* vcpu->arch.hflags == 0
* kvm_state->hdr.vmx.smm.flags == KVM_STATE_NESTED_SMM_VMXON

Please feel free to ask me any more data points you need.

Thanks,
Eiichi

> On Oct 26, 2023, at 17:52, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Cc'ing Max :-) At first glance the condition in vmx_set_nested_state()
> is correct so I guess we either have a stale
> KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING when in SMM or stale smm.flags when outside
> of it...
> 
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> writes:
> 
>> Cc'ing Vitaly.
>> 
>> On 26/10/23 07:49, Eiichi Tsukata wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Here is additional details on the issue.
>>> 
>>> We've found this issue when testing Windows Virtual Secure Mode (VSM) VMs.
>>> We sometimes saw live migration failures of VSM-enabled VMs. It turned
>>> out that the issue happens during live migration when VMs change boot 
>>> related
>>> EFI variables (ex: BootOrder, Boot0001).
>>> After some debugging, I've found the race I mentioned in the commit message.
>>> 
>>> Symptom
>>> =======
>>> 
>>> When it happnes with the latest Qemu which has commit 
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_qemu_qemu_commit_7191f24c7fcfbc1216d09&d=DwIFaQ&c=s883GpUCOChKOHiocYtGcg&r=dy01Dr4Ly8mhvnUdx1pZhhT1bkq4h9z5aVWu3paoZtk&m=w7w9eoWDJkzNpMAP1--ljTEkGkHZkB_81JBr2vdK47SK2RQFyAJHI5f13n2bybQF&s=orR7p9iiUFmw98VuhxB-Uc6Jtn91Ldm1V6qOhIqRKnc&e=
>>>  
>>> Qemu shows the following error message on destination.
>>> 
>>>   qemu-system-x86_64: Failed to put registers after init: Invalid argument
>>> 
>>> If it happens with older Qemu which doesn't have the commit, then we see  
>>> CPU dump something like this:
>>> 
>>>   KVM internal error. Suberror: 3
>>>   extra data[0]: 0x0000000080000b0e
>>>   extra data[1]: 0x0000000000000031
>>>   extra data[2]: 0x0000000000000683
>>>   extra data[3]: 0x000000007f809000
>>>   extra data[4]: 0x0000000000000026
>>>   RAX=0000000000000000 RBX=0000000000000000 RCX=0000000000000000 
>>> RDX=0000000000000f61
>>>   RSI=0000000000000000 RDI=0000000000000000 RBP=0000000000000000 
>>> RSP=0000000000000000
>>>   R8 =0000000000000000 R9 =0000000000000000 R10=0000000000000000 
>>> R11=0000000000000000
>>>   R12=0000000000000000 R13=0000000000000000 R14=0000000000000000 
>>> R15=0000000000000000
>>>   RIP=000000000000fff0 RFL=00010002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
>>>   ES =0020 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS   [-WA]
>>>   CS =0038 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00a09b00 DPL=0 CS64 [-RA]
>>>   SS =0020 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS   [-WA]
>>>   DS =0020 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS   [-WA]
>>>   FS =0020 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS   [-WA]
>>>   GS =0020 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS   [-WA]
>>>   LDT=0000 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c00000
>>>   TR =0040 000000007f7df050 00068fff 00808b00 DPL=0 TSS64-busy
>>>   GDT=     000000007f7df000 0000004f
>>>   IDT=     000000007f836000 000001ff
>>>   CR0=80010033 CR2=000000000000fff0 CR3=000000007f809000 CR4=00000668
>>>   DR0=0000000000000000 DR1=0000000000000000 DR2=0000000000000000 
>>> DR3=0000000000000000    DR6=00000000ffff0ff0 DR7=0000000000000400
>>>   EFER=0000000000000d00
>>>   Code=?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? <??> ?? 
>>> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? 
>>> ?? ?? ??
>>> 
>>> In the above dump, CR3 is pointing to SMRAM region though SMM=0.
>>> 
>>> Repro
>>> =====
>>> 
>>> Repro step is pretty simple.
>>> 
>>> * Run SMM enabled Linux guest with secure boot enabled OVMF.
>>> * Run the following script in the guest.
>>> 
>>>   /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm &
>>>   while true
>>>   do
>>>     efibootmgr -n 1
>>>   done
>>> 
>>> * Do live migration
>>> 
>>> On my environment, live migration fails in 20%.
>>> 
>>> VMX specific
>>> ============
>>> 
>>> This issue is VMX sepcific and SVM is not affected as the validation
>>> in svm_set_nested_state() is a bit different from VMX one.
>>> 
>>> VMX:
>>> 
>>>   static int vmx_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>                                   struct kvm_nested_state __user 
>>> *user_kvm_nested_state,
>>>                                   struct kvm_nested_state *kvm_state)
>>>   {
>>>   ..           /*             * SMM temporarily disables VMX, so we cannot 
>>> be in guest mode,
>>>          * nor can VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME be pending.  Outside SMM, SMM flags
>>>          * must be zero.
>>>          */           if (is_smm(vcpu) ?
>>>                 (kvm_state->flags &
>>>                  (KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE | 
>>> KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING))
>>>                 : kvm_state->hdr.vmx.smm.flags)
>>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>>   ..
>>> 
>>> SVM:
>>> 
>>>   static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>                                   struct kvm_nested_state __user 
>>> *user_kvm_nested_state,
>>>                                   struct kvm_nested_state *kvm_state)
>>>   {
>>>   ..           /* SMM temporarily disables SVM, so we cannot be in guest 
>>> mode.  */           if (is_smm(vcpu) && (kvm_state->flags & 
>>> KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE))
>>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>>   ..
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Eiichi
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 26, 2023, at 14:42, Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> kvm_put_vcpu_events() needs to be called before kvm_put_nested_state()
>>>> because vCPU's hflag is referred in KVM vmx_get_nested_state()
>>>> validation. Otherwise kvm_put_nested_state() can fail with -EINVAL when
>>>> a vCPU is in VMX operation and enters SMM mode. This leads to live
>>>> migration failure.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>>>> index e7c054cc16..cd635c9142 100644
>>>> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>>>> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>>>> @@ -4741,6 +4741,15 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cpu, int level)
>>>>         return ret;
>>>>     }
>>>> 
>>>> +    /*
>>>> +     * must be before kvm_put_nested_state so that HF_SMM_MASK is set 
>>>> during
>>>> +     * SMM.
>>>> +     */
>>>> +    ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(x86_cpu, level);
>>>> +    if (ret < 0) {
>>>> +        return ret;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>>     if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {
>>>>         ret = kvm_put_nested_state(x86_cpu);
>>>>         if (ret < 0) {
>>>> @@ -4787,10 +4796,6 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cpu, int level)
>>>>     if (ret < 0) {
>>>>         return ret;
>>>>     }
>>>> -    ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(x86_cpu, level);
>>>> -    if (ret < 0) {
>>>> -        return ret;
>>>> -    }
>>>>     if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {
>>>>         ret = kvm_put_mp_state(x86_cpu);
>>>>         if (ret < 0) {
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.41.0
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Vitaly



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]