[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Acl-devel] [PATCH] attr: refer to ENODATA instead of ENOATTR in man
Re: [Acl-devel] [PATCH] attr: refer to ENODATA instead of ENOATTR in man pages
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:53:08 +0200
KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-431.1.2.el6.x86_64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; )
On Friday 28 March 2014 09:24:00 Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 09:22 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > On Friday 28 March 2014 08:07:21 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Tue 21 Jan 2014 14:27:33 Kamil Dudka wrote:
> >>> The ENOATTR alias is only provided if <attr/xattr.h> is included, not
> >>> with the more standard <sys/xattr.h> header file. ENODATA is correct
> >>> in both cases.
> >>> Reported by: Florian Weimer
> >>> Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1055933
> >> this reminds me. imo, fedora is doing the wrong thing and deleting the
> >> man2 pages from the man-pages project and instead using the man pages
> >> from the attr project. the man-pages one makes a lot more sense in the
> >> Linux world and are kept more up to date. so perhaps if you fix that
> >> problem, the attr man pages don't need changing ?
> >> -mike
> > Sounds reasonable to me. Unless anybody objects, I can take care of
> > switching the man pages to be installed by the man-pages package.
> Yes, this is also fine. Thanks!
I have removed them from the libattr-devel package:
... and filed a bug to include them in the man-pages package: