|
From: | Kevin Smith |
Subject: | [Arx-users] Gnome and MS Windows? |
Date: | Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:17:06 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040916) |
Greetings,One of the "must have" features for any version control system is the ability to work on MS Windows. Although I personally escaped Redmond a few years ago, the reality is that most projects I work on are still cross-platform.
My impression is that arx is in a better position to work on MS Windows that tla, because it uses shorter path names, and more standard libraries.
However, I noticed in the recent 2.1.1 changelog that arx now uses gnome url encoding, in addition to the earlier dependency on gnome-vfs. I'm a bit concerned that too much reliance on gnome may make it harder to port to MS Windows later. Is this a realistic concern?
KevinP.S. Walter: Thanks for continuing to make arx more and more usable. You seem to continue to make excellent choices about how to sift through all the tla features and distill out a simple but powerful (enough) set.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |