[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Arx-users] Reasons not to switch to ArX
From: |
amine . chadly |
Subject: |
Re: [Arx-users] Reasons not to switch to ArX |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:37:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.2) |
Quoting Walter Landry <wlandry_at_ucsd.edu>:
Kevin Smith <yarcs_at_qualitycode.com> wrote:
At work, one of our projects is seriously considering switching to
Subversion (from CVS). While I think svn is a worthy replacement for
cvs, I don't see it as the ideal long-term option. This event has
re-invigorated my interest in ArX, although I still have too many other
vastly time-consuming projects going on right now to be able to
contribute much to ArX.
Hi Kevin, I can share some thoughts and experience with you here:
I have been using svn on windows. And I was very pleased with it, until
I had a crash of the berkeley db that couldn't be recovered.
At that point the only thing you can do, is restore a previous backup of
your repository, and commit all the changes in one shot.
I was using the 1.0 version at that point of time, I have heard things
have improved, but my advice for you is to make frequent backups of your
repository (which is good practice regardless of your final choice ;-).
I hope to be contributing to ArX soon, as I am starting to get more and
more free time.
Regarding the win32 port, the gui and eclipse plugin. There might be a way
to catch all the birds with one stone :
The source code for the eclipse cvs plugin is probably very interesting:
The following directories
org.eclipse.team.cvs.core_3.0.1
org.eclipse.team.cvs.ssh2_3.0.0
org.eclipse.team.cvs.ssh_3.0.0
org.eclipse.team.cvs.ui_3.0.1
should contain enough information to jumpstart an ArX eclipse plugin
relatively
shortly.
I will give it a look in the coming days, but would welcome any help ;-).
The qt gui is an interesting perspective as well.
I have been dreaming on giving qt a try, and it sounds like a nice
opportunity.
Anybody wants to jump onboard ?
And one thing as I am at it:
I find the documentation a little difficult to comprehend the first time.
I started a document that could qualify as a nutshell answering very basic
question that one asks himself the firt time (or coming back after long
vacations :-).
Is anybody interested in adding some more beef to it and publish it ?
Take care everybody,
-amine
Ps: please make sure you don't leave any email adress in the messages quotes,
so robots don't have a chance to spam our axxes ! ;-)
- [Arx-users] Reasons not to switch to ArX, Kevin Smith, 2005/03/21
- Re: [Arx-users] Reasons not to switch to ArX, Walter Landry, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Arx-users] Reasons not to switch to ArX,
amine . chadly <=
- Re: [Arx-users] Reasons not to switch to ArX, Kevin Smith, 2005/03/25
- [Arx-users] Proposal, amine . chadly, 2005/03/29
- Re: [Arx-users] Proposal, Walter Landry, 2005/03/29
- Re: [Arx-users] Proposal, Amine Chadly, 2005/03/30
- Re: [Arx-users] Proposal, Walter Landry, 2005/03/31
- [Arx-users] GUI front-end for ArX (was: Re: Proposal), Kevin Smith, 2005/03/30
- Re: [Arx-users] GUI front-end for ArX, Amine Chadly, 2005/03/30
- Re: [Arx-users] GUI front-end for ArX, Kevin Smith, 2005/03/30
- Re: [Arx-users] GUI front-end for ArX, Walter Landry, 2005/03/31
- Re: [Arx-users] GUI front-end for ArX, Kevin Smith, 2005/03/31