[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Arx-users] Real-world ArX usage
From: |
Walter Landry |
Subject: |
Re: [Arx-users] Real-world ArX usage |
Date: |
Sat, 28 May 2005 13:47:40 -0400 (EDT) |
Kevin Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> Walter Landry wrote:
> >>On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 08:41 -0400, Kevin Smith wrote:
> >>>In a perfect world, it would monitor each
> >>>developer's mirrored archive, and automatically initiate the merge.
> >
> >
> > Are you sure you want to do that?
>
> I think so. Conceptually, when a developer submits changes to the master
> server, they are being committed to the master archive. So automatically
> pulling them into the master whenever they appear seems logical. In a
> perfect world, the daemon would wait for 5 minutes of inactivity, and
> then pull all pending changes. That's the approach taken by some CVS/Ant
> tools like CruiseControl and AntHill.
>
> Do you see problems with this approach?
For some reason, I missed the "mirrored" part of the "mirrored
archive" the first time I read it. This looks fine. You could even
put in a hook, so that every time you pushed to the mirror, you would
submit a merge request.
Cheers,
Walter
- Re: [Arx-users] Real-world ArX usage,
Walter Landry <=