[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Aspell-user] Thread Safety Question
From: |
Jake Goulding |
Subject: |
[Aspell-user] Thread Safety Question |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:18:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) |
Is the current version (0.60.3) thread safe? Browsing the manual for
aspell has these two relvant sections:
6.1.4 Notes About Thread Safety
Aspell should be thread safe, when used properly, as long as the
underlying compiler, C and C++ library is thread safe. Aspell objects,
including the AspellSpeller class, should not be used by multiple
threads unless they are protected by locks or it is only accessed by
read-only methods. A method is read-only only if a |const| object is
passed in. Many methods that seam to be read-only are not because they
may store state information in the object.
D.1.1 Things that need to be done
* Make Aspell *Thread safe*. Even though Aspell itself is not
multi-threaded I would like it to be thread safe so that it can be
used by multi-threaded programs. There are several areas of Aspell
that that are potently thread unsafe (such as accessing a global
pool) and several classes which have the potential of being used
by more than one thread (such as the personal dictionary). /[In
Progress]/.
Which of these two paragraphs should I trust?
Thanks!
-Jake
- [Aspell-user] Thread Safety Question,
Jake Goulding <=