[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh)
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh) |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:58:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 13:54, Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> wrote:
> You should ask your colleague why they're using such an old version :-)
Because I did not bother to upgrade for them (since I switched to GNU
emacs and everything was fine till now.
> We can't edit history (this principle is probably even more important
> in Mercurial than in git), I'm not sure what you expect us to do.
Oh just some hint in the log message that 11.92 is the last version
compatible with xemacs: If you wouldn't have told me, I did not know to
figure that out (besides using google)
> What was released 10 years ago? 11.92 was released 2 years ago and is
> functionally identical to the latest stable version (12.1), apart from
> the fact this won't run with XEmacs.
Ok my bad misunderstanding. So it was 2 years ago and 11.84 was 12 ago,
I did not interpolate well enough. :'(
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh), Uwe Brauer, 2019/06/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh), Mosè Giordano, 2019/06/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh), Uwe Brauer, 2019/06/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh), Mosè Giordano, 2019/06/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh),
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh), David Kastrup, 2019/06/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh), Uwe Brauer, 2019/06/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh), David Kastrup, 2019/06/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh), Uwe Brauer, 2019/06/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] xemacs (sigh), David Kastrup, 2019/06/18