Re: Uncertain prettification

[Ikumi Keita]

Hi Tassilo, thanks for your comments and working on the new ELPA
release!

>>>>> Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> writes:
> For me its 220 vs. 233 seconds which is totally acceptable.  Another way
> would be to bump the required Emacs version to 25.1 where we could omit
> all (f)boundp-checks.  Or as a third option, we could only check

>   (fboundp 'prettify-symbols-default-compose-p)

> which is always defined (even directly after emacs -Q) and available
> from 25.1 on where we can assume that prettify-symbols-compose-predicate
> and tex--prettify-symbols-alist are also available.  And then we can
> defer loading tex-mode in VirTeX-common-initialization.

I like the second option, considering that Arash proposed to raise the
minimum supported Emacs version to 25.1. How about the attached patch?

Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine

0001-Make-prettification-work-reliably.patch
Description: revised patch