[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT
|
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:34:03 -0400 (EDT) |
Hello, Morten!
On 12 Oct 2000, Morten Eriksen wrote:
> * Pavel Roskin
> | [...] _AC_LINK_IFELSE that is the same as AC_LINK_IFELSE but
> | accepting _possible_ suffix as argument.
>
> This is for all practical purposes the same as setting $ac_exeext by
> hand and running the "standard" _AC_LINK_IFELSE.
Don't bother to change anything. My point was only that _something_ should
be done to prevent circular dependency. It has been done and I see no
reasons to change it.
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/12
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT,
Pavel Roskin <=
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Ralf Corsepius, 2000/10/11
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/11
RE: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/10/12
RE: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/10/12