[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optimization for install-sh
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Optimization for install-sh |
Date: |
10 Nov 2000 10:11:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
Pavel> Hello, Akim!
>> I don't think it is ``maintained'': we've swallowed it as is, and
>> didn't really pay attention to it. If we decide to ``maintain'' it
>> (why not), then it should have some --version.
Pavel> Not only. In this case we may need to implement all the long
Pavel> option that GNU install supports (--backup,
Pavel> --preserve-timestamps etc), which is quite a lot work.
Well, I realize my comment was most obscure :) What I really meant is
that we need to give it a version number.
But I personally consider install-sh and mkinstalldirs and mdate-sh
etc. have no future --missing and/or shtool have--, so there is no
real need to GNUify them. IMHO.
- Optimization for install-sh, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/08
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/09
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/09
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/09
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10
- Message not available
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/10