[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 18-bugs.patch

From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: 18-bugs.patch
Date: 13 Nov 2000 19:58:47 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands)

>>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:

Pavel> Ok, the endless loop in _AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE is the only bug
Pavel> I meant.

What is the architecture?  I don't remember.  I don't remember whether
we used the `int foo[-1]' trick, or the `case 0: case 0:' one.  Did
you try whether the other works?

Pavel> The solution would involve eighter another "exit 77" that I
Pavel> hate (but maybe I'll have) to do or changing AT_CHECK to accept
Pavel> multiple combinations of (STATUS, STDOUT, STDERR), which is
Pavel> damn hard to do.

Yes.  I still don't understand what's wrong with exit 77.  configure
has two exit status values: 0 and non 0.

>> BTW, when you update this file, could you add words like ``please,
>> don't register known bugs to GNATS''?

Pavel> Do it yourself. I see nothing wrong in registering known bugs
Pavel> in GNATS, but you may have reasons.

Additional useless workload.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]