[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More verbose AC_TRY_RUN

From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: More verbose AC_TRY_RUN
Date: 16 Nov 2000 19:02:22 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands)

-if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_link) &&
-   test -s conftest$ac_exeext && (./conftest$ac_exeext; exit) 2>/dev/null; then
+AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_link) &&
+  (./conftest$ac_exeext) >&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD 2>&1;

Yep, it is on purpose there is no longer the test -s, methinks the
shell will have a fine message stating that conftest is either missing
or dead broken, while before `test' would have failed silently, and
the log would have contained no hint of the cause of the failure.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]