autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lay groundwork for exec. ext. support


From: Lars J. Aas
Subject: Re: Lay groundwork for exec. ext. support
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:03:10 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 07:55:24PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
: >>>>> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <address@hidden> writes:
: Lars> '' is only sensible as an _extension_, I transformed the list
: Lars> into complete executable name templates so '' isn't needed.
: 
: Lars> I can understand your dislike of using eval, of course, but I
: Lars> didn't find a better eval-less form when testing for this
: Lars> suggestion.
: 
: sed expressions?
: 
: But really, I'm just kidding here, I don't think we need that.  Do
: you?  Or did I miss something else?

The actual question is; will executable forms only differ on basename
postfixes?  A: I don't know.

  Lars J
-- 
This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]